Closed
Conversation
4da4a36 to
326cc56
Compare
Member
|
res_user.py is not migrated to new API. |
326cc56 to
c58dc87
Compare
Member
Author
|
Travis was stuck, so superseded by #519 |
SiesslPhillip
pushed a commit
to grueneerde/OCA-server-tools
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2024
Syncing from upstream OCA/server-tools (12.0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in order to minimize the diff with v9 (another migration PR to v9 is also coming)
note: I don't think it's possible to convert the file res_users in 8.0 to the new API however because all methods are called from an overload of the authenticate method written in the old style API.
cc @legalsylvain