Set Papilo back to the main branch

[nguidotti]

Set Papilo back to the main branch as the issue related with DualInfer reduction has been fixed. See scipopt/papilo#89.

Closes #1585.

Checklist

• I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
• Testing
  • New or existing tests cover these changes
  • Added tests
  • Created an issue to follow-up
  • NA
• Documentation
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes
  • Added new documentation
  • NA

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CMake configuration now fetches Papilo from the upstream SCIPOpt repository at a pinned commit. Previous fork-specific comments and the former commit reference were removed.

Changes

Papilo source update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update Papilo fetch source cpp/CMakeLists.txt	Papilo now uses the upstream SCIPOpt repository and commit 2f29bb6e4c4217d7d915da7e2936cd4ee1dddec2.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: akifcorduk, aliceb-nv, tmckayus

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change by stating that Papilo is set back to its main branch.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the Papilo update, the DualInfer fix, the linked issue, and the completed checks.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

CI Test Summary

8 failed · 23 passed · 0 skipped

[jameslamb]

approving for ci-codeowners

[github-actions]

🔔 Hi @anandhkb @nguidotti, this pull request has had no activity for 7 days. Please update or let us know if it can be closed. Thank you!

If this is an "epic" issue, then please add the "epic" label to this issue.
If it is a PR and not ready for review, then please convert this to draft.
If you just want to switch off this notification, then use the "skip inactivity reminder" label.