Skip to content

<fix>[localstorage]: ZSTAC-84163 check capacity by target primary storage - #4689

Open
MatheMatrix wants to merge 1 commit into
5.5.38from
sync/xiangheng.zhao/fix/ZSTAC-84163-local-storage-capacity@@2
Open

<fix>[localstorage]: ZSTAC-84163 check capacity by target primary storage#4689
MatheMatrix wants to merge 1 commit into
5.5.38from
sync/xiangheng.zhao/fix/ZSTAC-84163-local-storage-capacity@@2

Conversation

@MatheMatrix

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Root Cause:
LocalStorageAllocatorFactory used HostAllocatorSpec.getDiskSize() to check every local storage host ref. The value was the total size of root and data disks, so disks assigned to non-local primary storage were also counted against local storage and could incorrectly filter out a valid host.

Solution:
Carry root and data disk capacity requirements as primary-storage UUID and size tuples. Local storage sums requirements assigned to the current local primary storage. If any requirement has no determined primary storage and the host cluster only attaches local storage, retain the conservative total-size check. Migration uses the same per-primary-storage calculation because its producer records the destination primary storage with the migration capacity.

Test:
Update CreateVmHostAllocateCase to cover insufficient all-local capacity, mixed local/NFS placement, and partially undetermined primary storage.

Verified with:
Not run as requested.

Resolves: ZSTAC-84163

Change-Id: I3f9895c605819a570a580cedfeaf1d80db300c80

sync from gitlab !10742

…rage

Root Cause:
LocalStorageAllocatorFactory used HostAllocatorSpec.getDiskSize() to check every local storage host ref. The value was the total size of root and data disks, so disks assigned to non-local primary storage were also counted against local storage and could incorrectly filter out a valid host.

Solution:
Carry root and data disk capacity requirements as primary-storage UUID and size tuples. Local storage sums requirements assigned to the current local primary storage. If any requirement has no determined primary storage and the host cluster only attaches local storage, retain the conservative total-size check. Migration uses the same per-primary-storage calculation because its producer records the destination primary storage with the migration capacity.

Test:
Update CreateVmHostAllocateCase to cover insufficient all-local capacity, mixed local/NFS placement, and partially undetermined primary storage.

Verified with:
Not run as requested.

Resolves: ZSTAC-84163

Change-Id: I3f9895c605819a570a580cedfeaf1d80db300c80
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 13 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You completed 89 included PR reviews in the past 7 days; at that activity level, included reviews refill at 1 review per hour.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0311bbe8-5c8f-489c-8a07-356438939fc7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3dcb52e and 48d6932.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • compute/src/main/java/org/zstack/compute/vm/VmAllocateHostFlow.java
  • header/src/main/java/org/zstack/header/allocator/AllocateHostMsg.java
  • header/src/main/java/org/zstack/header/allocator/HostAllocatorSpec.java
  • plugin/localstorage/src/main/java/org/zstack/storage/primary/local/LocalStorageAllocatorFactory.java
  • test/src/test/groovy/org/zstack/test/integration/storage/primary/local_nfs/allocator/host/CreateVmHostAllocateCase.groovy

Warning

.coderabbit.yaml has a parsing error

The CodeRabbit configuration file in this repository has a parsing error and default settings were used instead. Please fix the error(s) in the configuration file. You can initialize chat with CodeRabbit to get help with the configuration file.

💥 Parsing errors (1)
Could not fetch remote config from http://open.zstack.ai:20001/code-reviews/zstack-cloud.yaml: TimeoutError: The operation was aborted due to timeout
⚙️ Configuration instructions
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • You can also validate your configuration using the online YAML validator.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant