Skip to content

docs: remove assistant-process wording #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Labeeb2339 merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

docs: remove assistant-process wording #2

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ and compared at an equal bit budget. See
preserves the [failed signals and replacement](research/EXPERIMENT_001_SIGNAL_PIVOT.md)
and the [untouched confirmation](research/CONFIRMATION_001.md).

The user-suggested
[Gated DeltaNet-2 paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22791) reinforces why erase,
[Gated DeltaNet-2](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22791) reinforces why erase,
write, and decay behavior should be analyzed separately. Its non-commercial
reference code is not a RecurQuant dependency, and the initial target remains
Apache-2.0 Qwen3.5.
Expand Down
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions research/CLAIM_BOUNDARY.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@ audit and confirmatory experiments are required before stronger wording.
- "Breakthrough," "state of the art," or "novel" based only on the pilot.
- Authorship of Qwen3.5 or any other base model.

## Authorship if the project succeeds
## What this project contributes

The defensible contribution would be the allocation method, implementation,
evaluation protocol, and any clearly labelled derivative artifact. Qwen3.5 and
its architecture remain credited to the Qwen team.
RecurQuant's contribution is its allocation method, implementation, evaluation
protocol, and clearly labelled derivative artifacts. It does not claim
authorship of Qwen3.5 or its architecture, which remain credited to the Qwen
team.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions research/PRIOR_ART.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ the search before any paper or novelty statement.

## Architecture evidence

- [Gated DeltaNet-2](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22791), suggested during this
project, separates channel-wise erase and write gates. It motivates analyzing
- [Gated DeltaNet-2](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22791) separates channel-wise
erase and write gates. That distinction motivates analyzing
the two state axes separately but does not establish precision allocation.
Its [official code](https://github.com/NVlabs/GatedDeltaNet-2) uses the NVIDIA
Source Code License-NC and is not copied into this Apache-2.0 repository.
Expand Down