Conversation
|
@clayellis Do you think this is still an issue with Files 4.0+? |
|
@JohnSundell the surface area of the rename API didn't change between 3 and 4 — so I think the original motivations from #67 remain. However, I wasn't the one who brought up the issue, I just wrote the "fix", so I'm not super opinionated. Though, I do think this revision is a little more explicit and helps the user clarify their intent. |
|
#124 is kinda related in terms of what name and what extension is, I suppose that for the hidden files the current PR implementation may treat name as an empty string Example Btw I think that getting the name and the extension should probably work like this 🤔 |
|
Closing, since it's been a few years without activity. |
Resolves #67