docs: link OpenChainBench public Injective RPC latency benchmark - #182
docs: link OpenChainBench public Injective RPC latency benchmark#182Flotapponnier wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds documentation for continuous OpenChainBench latency benchmarks covering the Injective RPC ChangesPublic latency benchmarks
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.gitbook/infra/public-endpoints.mdx:
- Line 60: Update the OpenChainBench probe-region description in the public
Injective RPC provider section to replace “Paris” with “Amsterdam,” preserving
Virginia and Singapore.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 09325033-4e33-4bad-898c-cf3faddaf219
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.gitbook/infra/public-endpoints.mdx
|
|
||
| ## Public latency benchmarks | ||
|
|
||
| For integrators comparing public Injective RPC providers, [OpenChainBench](https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/injective-rpc) publishes a continuous latency benchmark of the Tendermint `status` method across the Injective Foundation endpoint and community providers (PublicNode, Polkachu, LavenderFive). Probes run every 60s from Paris, Virginia, and Singapore. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Correct the European probe location.
The benchmark methodology identifies the three regions as Virginia, Amsterdam, and Singapore; this sentence incorrectly says Paris. Please replace Paris with Amsterdam or use the canonical labels us-east, eu-west, and sgp. (openchainbench.com)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.gitbook/infra/public-endpoints.mdx at line 60, Update the OpenChainBench
probe-region description in the public Injective RPC provider section to replace
“Paris” with “Amsterdam,” preserving Virginia and Singapore.
Source: MCP tools
5ebb0ef to
43fe357
Compare
Summary
Adds a short section to
Public Endpointslinking to OpenChainBench, a public, open-source latency benchmark for Injective's Tendermint RPC providers. It probes the Injective Foundation endpoint and community providers (PublicNode, Polkachu, LavenderFive) every 60s from three regions (Paris, Virginia, Singapore) using thestatusmethod.Intended as a neutral cross-check for integrators picking between the free public RPC options already listed on this page.
Source and methodology are open: https://github.com/ChainBench/openchainbench
Precedent for this kind of addition:
Change
.gitbook/infra/public-endpoints.mdxunder a new## Public latency benchmarksheading.Summary by CodeRabbit
statuslatency measurements.