Skip to content
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions doc/specific_iocs/magnets/TDK-Lambda-Genesys.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,6 +10,25 @@ The connection on the back of the device is an RJ45. However, the device does no

Note that there is a spare 25 way connector in the office (if you use it please replace it!). I couldn't get it working with a 9 way.

Note: 9 way connector diagram is incorrect - pin 7 is Ground on 25 way connector, but it is pin 5 on a DB9 for ground, so it may work if DB9 pin 5 was mapped instead of DB9 pin 7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we update the diagram instead of just saying "diagram is incorrect" in prose later?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was planning to delete the diagram and use the table I added instead if that is more correct, but we'll not know until we try a DB9

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If db9 works remove db25 table too

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

given its in version control i'll delete diagram now

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the 25 way and 9 way in the original table seem to view the rj45 differently, i don't think it is completely explained by the db25 being a male connector and DB9 being a female. Other than using pin 5 rather than 7 i agree the db9 matches the original manual picture, but the db25 doesn't. However the DB25 works, so that may suggest the pin numbers on the original table are right correct for an RJ45 but not for a cable as shown. If that is so, the db9 i just made will not work and needs some bits swapping.


from TDK Manual

| DB25 || RJ 45 ||
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| PIN | NAME | PIN | NAME |
| 2 | TX | 8 | RX |
| 3 | RX | 7 | TX |
| 7 | GND | 1 | GND |

| DB9 || RJ 45 ||
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| PIN | NAME | PIN | NAME |
| 2 | RX | 7 | TX |
| 3 | TX | 8 | RX |
| 5 | GND | 1 | GND |


## Macros

As well as the typical communication macros such as `BAUD`. `BITS`, `PARITY` etc, there are a number of specialist macros for each power supply in this IOC:
Expand Down