added GA support for largeCapacityConfig#17077
added GA support for largeCapacityConfig#17077c2thorn merged 8 commits intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
Conversation
raazanand
commented
Apr 10, 2026
|
Googlers: For automatic test runs see go/terraform-auto-test-runs. @c2thorn, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
🟢 All tests passed! View the build log |
| @@ -931,14 +931,13 @@ func TestAccNetappStoragePool_ScaleType(t *testing.T) { | |||
| func testAccNetappStoragePool_ScaleType(context map[string]interface{}) string { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this test doesn't seem to actually use the promoted field? in fact, I can't find that field tested in this file at all
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The scale_type field was already present; I simply refactored some code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This has nothing to do with largeCapacityConfig; largeCapacityConfig requires a valid pool's scale_type value.
c2thorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
noting that there is no test for largeCapacityConfig, but this just makes that true for both GA and beta now.
0b7fc09