Validate filepaths in file utilities#5842
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @christopherholland-workday, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the security of file utility functions by introducing comprehensive input validation. It focuses on preventing path traversal attacks by ensuring that identifiers like Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances security by adding validation for file paths used in file utilities. The changes correctly validate chatflowId and fileName to prevent path traversal attacks. However, the validation for chatId is incomplete; it is checked for existence but not for the UUID format as stated in the pull request description. I've added comments to point out where this validation should be added for comprehensive security.
chatflowIdis a valid UUID'schatIdis presentfilenamedoes not contain path traversal patternsfilenamedoes not contain path traversal patternsAddresses CodeQL findings 45-50
(Moved from #5778 because the previous PR got polluted)