Skip to content

Add public phase timing skill - #1445

Draft
msandeep12 wants to merge 2 commits into
Fission-AI:mainfrom
msandeep12:feature/openspec-phase-timing
Draft

Add public phase timing skill#1445
msandeep12 wants to merge 2 commits into
Fission-AI:mainfrom
msandeep12:feature/openspec-phase-timing

Conversation

@msandeep12

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary
This change adds phase timing support to the OpenSpec workflow, improving how phase progress and timing are tracked during change execution.

What changed
Added support for phase timing behavior in the relevant workflow logic
Updated related command and state handling to reflect timing information
Adjusted tests and supporting logic to cover the new behavior
Why
This improves visibility into phase progression and helps make the workflow more predictable and easier to reason about during execution.

Testing
Verified relevant unit and integration tests for the updated workflow behavior

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5665d72f-7b14-4c90-9388-3eed407c5b2b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants