[Odometer] Blob URL loss detection

[jakubkalinski0]

Explanation of Change

PR #86022 has to be merged before we can go ahead with this one

Blob URLs (blob://...) live only in browser memory. A page refresh destroys them. Attempting to stitch with expired blobs would fail.

Two safeguards are in place:

• useRestartOnOdometerImagesFailure hook (mounted on IOURequestStepDistanceOdometer): on mount, calls checkIfLocalFileIsAccessible for each blob URL stored in the transaction (start image, end image, stitched receipt). If any are unreachable and the request type is DISTANCE_ODOMETER, it clears all odometer data (images, readings, receipt, draft transactions) and navigates back to the start step.
• Pre-flight check in IOURequestStepConfirmation: before calling stitchOdometerImages, the stitching effect re-verifies all local blob URLs. If expired, it clears the transaction and navigates to the start step without ever showing a broken image.

Fixed Issues

$ #84707
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

1. Start an odometer expense request on web, upload both odometer start and end photos and both readings
2. Without submitting, refresh the browser page
3. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (in that case it just means that you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

4. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images
5. Tap one of the odometer images to open the image preview and refresh the browser page
6. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

7. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images
8. Tap one of the odometer images to open the image preview and press "Replace"
9. When on odometer image screen refresh the browser page
10. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

11. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images, and proceed to the confirmation screen
12. When on confirmation screen refresh the browser page
13. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

14. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images, and proceed to the confirmation screen
15. Tap one the receipt (stitched odometer images) to open the image preview and refresh the browser page
16. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

17. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images, and proceed to the confirmation screen
18. Then press "Distance" to land on the odometer screen and refresh the browser page
19. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

20. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images, and proceed to the confirmation screen
21. Then press "Distance" to land on the odometer screen and tap one of the odometer images to open the image preview
22. Refresh the browser page
23. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

---

24. Start an odometer expense, add both readings, capture both odometer images, and proceed to the confirmation screen
25. Then press "Distance" to land on the odometer screen and tap one of the odometer images to open the image preview and press "Replace"
26. When on odometer image screen refresh the browser page
27. Verify that the app detects the expired blob URLs and redirects you back to the start of the odometer flow (you should see a completely empty odometer tab)

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Only web

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/libs/stitchOdometerImages/constants.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useRestartOnReceiptFailure.ts	57.14% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/fileDownload/validateReceiptFile/index.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/iou/request/DistanceRequestStartPage.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...request/step/IOURequestStepOdometerImage/index.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepScan/index.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.tsx	61.63% <0.00%> (-0.26%)	⬇️
src/libs/stitchOdometerImages/index.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../components/MoneyRequestConfirmationListFooter.tsx	84.03% <75.00%> (+0.19%)	⬆️
src/libs/stitchOdometerImages/index.native.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes