Skip to content

Conversation

@strub
Copy link
Member

@strub strub commented Feb 2, 2026

The bck/fwd variants of seq are unused and are a leftover from CertiCrypt. No other tactic provides such variants. We may want to reintroduce them in the future, but for now this code is largely dead since it is not used by any project.

Internally, the seq tactic was called app. This commit updates that.

@strub strub self-assigned this Feb 2, 2026
@strub strub force-pushed the remove-unused-seq-variant branch 2 times, most recently from 0618e59 to d79a237 Compare February 2, 2026 09:25
@strub strub requested a review from oskgo February 2, 2026 09:26
The bck/fwd variants of `seq` are unused and are a leftover from
CertiCrypt. No other tactic provides such variants. We may want to
reintroduce them in the future, but for now this code is largely
dead since it is not used by any project.

Internally, the `seq` tactic was called `app`. This commit updates
that.
@strub strub force-pushed the remove-unused-seq-variant branch from d79a237 to b72e18c Compare February 2, 2026 09:26
@strub strub marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2026 09:26
@strub strub enabled auto-merge (rebase) February 2, 2026 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants