Make APPAR_TEMP and DISCOIS variables available when calc_human_stress_indices is FAST#4111
Open
olyson wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Make APPAR_TEMP and DISCOIS variables available when calc_human_stress_indices is FAST#4111olyson wants to merge 2 commits into
olyson wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…s_indices is FAST
Contributor
Author
|
This was supposed to go on b4b-dev but somehow I've based this on main. Suggestions on how to fix this? |
Contributor
Author
Ok, I've fixed this. |
wwieder
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Make APPAR_TEMP and DISCOIS variables available when calc_human_stress_indices is FAST.
These variables do not depend on the more expensive wet bulb calculation (calc_human_stress_indices=ALL).
Accomplish this by moving these variables out from within this if block within HumanIndexMod.F90:
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CTSM issues resolved or otherwise addressed, if any:
None
Any user interface changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
No
Testing planned or performed, if any:
Results are bfb except for field list differences as expected:
Requirements before merge: