Implement Confirmation Dialog System

[google-labs-jules]

Implemented a complete confirmation dialog system to replace native browser alerts. This system provides a consistent, themed UI for destructive actions and improves accessibility.

Key changes:

• Added web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx
• Added web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx
• Refactored web/pages/GroupDetails.tsx to use the new system
• Improved accessibility in web/components/ui/Modal.tsx

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 2948144666080415986 started by @Devasy23

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for split-but-wiser canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ae4c978
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/split-but-wiser/deploys/69745694036ea700082909d0

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Devasy]

@coderabbitai review this product compared to #256

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@Devasy23, I'll gather information about PR #256 and compare it with the current PR #260.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get details of PR `#256`
gh pr view 256 --json title,body,state,files,additions,deletions,changedFiles

# Get list of files changed in PR `#256`
gh pr view 256 --json files --jq '.files[].path'

# Get the diff for PR `#256` to understand the changes
gh pr diff 256

Length of output: 19626

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get details of PR `#260` (current PR)
gh pr view 260 --json title,body,state,files,additions,deletions,changedFiles

# Get list of files changed in PR `#260`
gh pr view 260 --json files --jq '.files[].path'

# Get the diff for PR `#260` to compare implementations
gh pr diff 260

Length of output: 14709

---

@Devasy23, I've analyzed both PRs. They implement the same feature but with notable differences. Here's a comprehensive comparison:

📊 Overview

Aspect	PR #256	PR #260 (Current)
Status	OPEN	OPEN
Files Changed	8 files	9 files
Lines	+294 / -22	+219 / -14
Jules Task	12669270586709539879	2948144666080415986

🔍 Key Differences

1. Component Variants

• PR #256: 3 variants (danger, warning, info) with distinct styling
• PR #260: 2 variants (danger, default)

2. Accessibility Implementation

PR #256 is more comprehensive:

// Adds aria-labelledby, id="modal-title", aria-label on close button
<div role="dialog" aria-modal="true" aria-labelledby="modal-title">
  <h3 id="modal-title">...</h3>
  <button aria-label="Close modal">...</button>

PR #260 is simpler:

// Only role and aria-modal on motion.div
<motion.div role="dialog" aria-modal="true">

3. API Design

• PR #256: Uses description prop (more semantic for longer text)
• PR #260: Uses message prop (simpler naming)

4. Usage Pattern

PR #256 (more readable):

const confirmed = await confirm({...});
if (confirmed) { ... }

PR #260 (more concise):

if (await confirm({...})) { ... }

5. Context Implementation

• PR #256: Uses useState for resolveRef with functional update
• PR #260: Uses useRef for resolveRef (potentially more efficient)

6. Documentation Quality

• PR #256: Detailed changelog with verification notes, Playwright testing mentioned
• PR #260: Simpler documentation

7. Component Complexity

• PR #256: 94 lines in ConfirmDialog.tsx (more elaborate icon/background logic)
• PR #260: 71 lines (cleaner, simpler implementation)

🎯 Recommendation

PR #256 is more production-ready due to:

1. ✅ Superior accessibility (complete ARIA attributes)
2. ✅ More variant options (warning for non-destructive confirmations)
3. ✅ Verified with Playwright (mentioned in description)
4. ✅ More comprehensive documentation
5. ✅ Better semantic API (description vs message)

PR #260 advantages:

• Simpler, more maintainable code
• Better ref handling with useRef
• More concise implementation

💡 Suggestion

Consider merging PR #256 and closing this one, OR enhance PR #260 with:

1. Add complete ARIA attributes from PR #256
2. Add warning and info variants
3. Rename message prop to description

Would you like me to help enhance PR #260 with the missing features, or should we proceed with PR #256 instead?

[Devasy]

@coderabbitai we should proceed with #256

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@Devasy, understood! Since you're proceeding with PR #256, I recommend closing this PR (#260) to avoid confusion and prevent accidental merging.

Next steps:

1. Close this PR (#260) with a note referencing #256
2. Review and merge PR #256 which has the more complete implementation
3. If you need any help reviewing or enhancing PR #256, feel free to mention me there

Would you like me to help with anything specific on PR #256, such as a final review before merging?