Skip to content

feat(sidecar): forward FFE exposures to EVP proxy#2026

Open
leoromanovsky wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
leo.romanovsky/ffe-sidecar-exposures
Open

feat(sidecar): forward FFE exposures to EVP proxy#2026
leoromanovsky wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
leo.romanovsky/ffe-sidecar-exposures

Conversation

@leoromanovsky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky commented May 22, 2026

Motivation

PHP FFE exposure delivery needs a native path with a cache that persists beyond a single PHP request/thread. The shared design doc is the cross-PR reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NvMfTpZWLBlFmEFNjdnlMyeVpy5l7KD8qujGFco6w2w/edit?tab=t.0

This PR is exposure-only. Metrics were split into #2052 so reviewers can evaluate exposure cache and delivery separately from OTLP evaluation metrics.

Changes

This adds caller-driven FFE exposure sidecar actions, exposure payload forwarding through the Agent EVP proxy, and a shared exposure cache that deduplicates repeated (service, env, version, flag, subject) assignments across PHP requests and sidecar connections.

The reusable FFE-domain pieces now live in datadog-ffe behind the exposure-events feature: exposure input types, the LRU deduplication cache, and JSON payload encoding. datadog-sidecar keeps only sidecar-specific work: deriving the agent EVP endpoint, building the HTTP request, applying the timeout, logging delivery failures, and integrating with sidecar lifecycle/actions.

Current PHP MVP path:

flowchart LR
    Eval["PHP native evaluation<br/>ddog_ffe_evaluate"]
    Batch["PHP tracer native memory<br/>request/thread-local exposure batch"]
    Shutdown["PHP RSHUTDOWN<br/>flush exposure batch"]
    Action["sidecar action<br/>record FFE exposures"]
    Domain["datadog-ffe<br/>feature: exposure-events<br/>types + cache + JSON encoder"]
    Sidecar["shared sidecar<br/>cross-request and cross-thread exposure cache"]
    Agent["Datadog Agent<br/>EVP proxy"]
    Intake["FFE exposure intake"]

    Eval -->|"doLog=true assignment"| Batch
    Batch --> Shutdown
    Shutdown --> Action
    Action --> Domain
    Domain --> Sidecar
    Sidecar --> Agent
    Agent --> Intake
Loading

Future Python/Ruby connection:

flowchart LR
    PyToday["dd-trace-py today<br/>host-language exposure writer"]
    RbToday["dd-trace-rb today<br/>host-language exposure writer"]
    PyFuture["dd-trace-py future<br/>explicit native opt-in"]
    RbFuture["dd-trace-rb future<br/>explicit native opt-in"]
    Native["libdatadog caller-driven<br/>FFE exposure action"]
    Shared["shared sidecar<br/>dedupe + EVP delivery"]
    Agent["Datadog Agent<br/>EVP proxy"]

    PyToday -. "current direct EVP path" .-> Agent
    RbToday -. "current direct EVP path" .-> Agent
    PyFuture -. "after ownership switch" .-> Native
    RbFuture -. "after ownership switch" .-> Native
    Native --> Shared
    Shared --> Agent
Loading

The future Python/Ruby arrows are intentionally not active behavior in this PR. They show why the reusable code lives in datadog-ffe rather than directly in sidecar internals, while preserving today's host-language ownership.

Why Python/Ruby do not double count today:

  • Python and Ruby use libdatadog for evaluation only; the evaluator returns assignment metadata and does not enqueue exposure telemetry as a side effect.
  • This PR adds a separate caller-driven sidecar action. Exposure emission happens only when an SDK explicitly records exposure candidates into that action. PHP wires this in its companion PR; Python and Ruby do not.
  • Python and Ruby therefore keep exactly their current host-language EVP exposure writers. They are not also sending exposure candidates through this native sidecar path.
  • The sidecar cache only deduplicates exposure candidates that enter the native sidecar path. It cannot protect direct host-language EVP writers, so future Python/Ruby migration must switch ownership to native logging and disable/bypass the host exposure writer for the same evaluations.

Reference implementation check: dd-trace-java follows the same exposure semantics and user ergonomics. Java's DDEvaluator is SDK-owned evaluation code; after resolving an assignment, it checks allocation doLog, builds an exposure event with flag, variant, allocation, targeting key, and context, and dispatches it through FeatureFlaggingGateway. ExposureWriterImpl subscribes to those exposure events, queues them, deduplicates with an LRU exposure cache, serializes service/env/version context, and posts to the Agent EVP proxy. Application code only calls the OpenFeature provider; it does not call an exposure API.

PHP mirrors that canonical shape, with PHP-specific lifecycle mechanics: the dd-trace-php evaluation bridge records doLog=true exposure candidates internally, request shutdown flushes the batch, and this PR's sidecar path owns cross-request deduplication and EVP delivery. For future Python/Ruby migration, the same rule applies: wire native exposure recording inside the SDK-owned evaluation path, and turn off the existing host-language exposure writer for those evaluations.

Decisions

No telemetry is emitted automatically from shared libdatadog evaluator calls. SDKs must explicitly enqueue FFE telemetry actions. This remains required for Python/Ruby coexistence because those SDKs currently log exposures and metrics in host-language code.

The sidecar cache deduplicates only exposure candidates sent through this native sidecar path; it cannot deduplicate direct host-language EVP writers.

Future Python/Ruby migration must be an ownership switch, not an additional writer. When those SDKs opt into this native exposure path, their host-language exposure writers must be disabled or bypassed for the same evaluations to avoid double counting.

Validation

Current head (8be471fbc) local validation:

cd /Users/leo.romanovsky/go/src/github.com/DataDog/libdatadog-ffe-sidecar-exposures
cargo fmt --check
cargo test -p datadog-ffe --features exposure-events telemetry::exposures
cargo test -p datadog-sidecar ffe_exposure
cargo check -p datadog-ffe
cargo check -p datadog-sidecar-ffi

Results: datadog-ffe exposure tests passed (4 passed), sidecar exposure tests passed (6 passed), default datadog-ffe check passed, sidecar FFI check passed, fmt check passed with only the repo stable-rustfmt warnings.

Prior downstream PHP behavior validation before the reusable-crate refactor, from DataDog/dd-trace-php#3910 using this PR at 6d23848a:

ffe-dogfooding subject=php-3910-split-1779981442
php7_exposures=1 php8_exposures=1
php7_metrics=0 php8_metrics=0

System-tests downstream validation:

TEST_LIBRARY=php ./run.sh FEATURE_FLAGGING_AND_EXPERIMENTATION tests/ffe/test_exposures.py -vv

Result: 11 passed in 77.53 seconds.

Related PRs: DataDog/dd-trace-php#3906, DataDog/dd-trace-php#3910, #2052, DataDog/system-tests#7031.

Adds SidecarAction::FfeExposures variant so the PHP tracer can hand a
batched exposure payload to the sidecar, and adds an ffe_flusher module
that POSTs the payload to the agent's EVP proxy at
/evp_proxy/v2/api/v2/exposures with X-Datadog-EVP-Subdomain:
event-platform-intake. Matches dd-trace-go / ruby / python / js /
dotnet wire protocol. Fire-and-forget; non-2xx is logged and dropped
(no agent_info gating, consistent with other tracers).

Also exposes ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_exposures FFI in datadog-sidecar-ffi
for the PHP extension to call from its RSHUTDOWN / MSHUTDOWN hooks.

Tests: 3 httpmock-backed cases cover POST method + path + subdomain
header + body, non-2xx drop, and endpoint-path override while
preserving authority / scheme / auth / timeout.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 22, 2026

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 5714 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-ffe - 198 warning(s)

📦 datadog-sidecar-ffi - 2889 warning(s)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2627 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-05-29 21:47:36 UTC | Commit: 969c488 | missing-docs job results

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 22, 2026

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/leo.romanovsky/ffe-sidecar-exposures

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
expect_used 2 2 No change (0%)
unwrap_used 7 7 No change (0%)
Total 9 9 No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
datadog-sidecar/src/service/sidecar_server.rs 6 6 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar/src/service/telemetry.rs 3 3 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 21 21 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 6 6 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 57 57 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 5 5 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 13 13 No change (0%)
Total 196 196 No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 22, 2026

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 14 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-ffe - 1 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:91:1
   │
91 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
         └── datadog-ffe v1.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 datadog-sidecar-ffi - 7 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
     │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unmaintained]: paste - no longer maintained
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:270:1
    │
270 │ paste 1.0.15 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2024-0436
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0436
    ├ The creator of the crate `paste` has stated in the [`README.md`](https://github.com/dtolnay/paste/blob/master/README.md) 
      that this project is not longer maintained as well as archived the repository
      
      ## Possible Alternative(s)
      
      - [`pastey`]: a fork of paste and is aimed to be a drop-in replacement with additional features for paste crate
      - [`with_builtin_macros`]: crate providing a [superset of `paste`'s functionality including general `macro_rules!` eager expansions](https://docs.rs/with_builtin_macros/0.1.0/with_builtin_macros/macro.with_eager_expansions.html)  and `concat!`/`concat_idents!` macros
      
      [`pastey`]: https://crates.io/crates/pastey
      [`with_builtin_macros`]: https://crates.io/crates/with_builtin_macros
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/paste
    ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
    ├ paste v1.0.15
      ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-libunwind-sys v1.0.2
      │   └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │       └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
      │           ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │           └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0
      │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      └── rmp v0.8.14
          ├── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │   │   │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │   │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── rmp-serde v1.3.0
          │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
          │   │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
          │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          └── rmpv v1.3.0
              └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:300:1
    │
300 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:327:1
    │
327 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:327:1
    │
327 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:327:1
    │
327 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:386:1
    │
386 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
                  │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
                  │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                  │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 datadog-sidecar - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:298:1
    │
298 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:325:1
    │
325 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:325:1
    │
325 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:325:1
    │
325 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v34.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v34.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:384:1
    │
384 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
                  │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
                  │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-05-29 21:48:32 UTC | Commit: 969c488 | dependency-check job results

@datadog-official
Copy link
Copy Markdown

datadog-official Bot commented May 22, 2026

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 83.16%
Overall Coverage: 73.26% (+0.36%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: d780e49 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 22, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.16151% with 98 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.26%. Comparing base (f7d471d) to head (d780e49).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2026      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.90%   73.26%   +0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         460      462       +2     
  Lines       76396    77293     +897     
==========================================
+ Hits        55696    56626     +930     
+ Misses      20700    20667      -33     
Components Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker 65.37% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️
libdd-crashtracker-ffi 36.82% <ø> (ø)
libdd-alloc 98.77% <ø> (ø)
libdd-data-pipeline 85.65% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi 76.17% <ø> (+0.47%) ⬆️
libdd-common 79.89% <ø> (ø)
libdd-common-ffi 74.41% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry 73.34% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry-ffi 31.36% <ø> (ø)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 82.64% <ø> (ø)
datadog-ipc 76.22% <ø> (ø)
libdd-profiling 81.70% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
libdd-profiling-ffi 64.79% <ø> (ø)
libdd-sampling 97.41% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
datadog-sidecar 33.74% <76.76%> (+4.54%) ⬆️
datdog-sidecar-ffi 12.21% <0.00%> (+2.03%) ⬆️
spawn-worker 48.86% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tinybytes 93.80% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-normalization 81.71% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 87.30% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-protobuf 68.25% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-utils 89.18% <ø> (+0.23%) ⬆️
libdd-tracer-flare 86.88% <ø> (ø)
libdd-log 74.83% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Adds a parallel pathway for PHP feature-flag evaluation metrics
mirroring the FfeExposures forwarder. dd-trace-php encodes
`feature_flag.evaluations` counters as OTLP/protobuf in PHP
(via its existing PHP 7-safe `OtlpMetricEncoder`) and ships the
encoded bytes to the sidecar, which POSTs them to the user-configured
OTLP HTTP metrics intake.

Why a sibling action instead of reusing FfeExposures:

- The OTLP collector is not the Datadog Agent. It's user-configurable
  via OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_METRICS_ENDPOINT (default
  http://localhost:4318/v1/metrics), so the endpoint travels with the
  payload rather than being derived from the sidecar session's agent
  base URL.
- Content type differs (application/x-protobuf vs application/json).
- No EVP subdomain header.
- The payload is binary protobuf, not a JSON string.

dd-trace-php side (PR DataDog/dd-trace-php#3911) will refactor its
existing `OtlpHttpMetricTransport` (which currently does PHP-side
HTTP I/O, violating the architectural rule "no I/O outside the
sidecar") to call this new FFI.

Validation:

- `cargo test -p datadog-sidecar ffe` passes 7 tests
  (3 exposures + 4 metrics).
- `cargo check -p datadog-sidecar-ffi` clean.
leoromanovsky added a commit to DataDog/dd-trace-php that referenced this pull request May 23, 2026
Adds Mermaid sources and rendered PNGs for the hook (this) PR plus a
README documenting the regeneration workflow.

- `docs/php-ffe-stack/stack-pr3909.mmd` + `.png` — 4-PR stack with this
  PR highlighted (M1 done; EVP and metrics as siblings to come).
- `docs/php-ffe-stack/system-pr3909.mmd` + `.png` — target system
  architecture; this PR contributes the EvaluationCompletedHook +
  OpenFeature provider hook surface. All downstream nodes (writers,
  sidecar FFI, sidecar process, backends) marked future.
- `docs/php-ffe-stack/README.md` — npx invocation for regenerating
  PNGs locally; PR-by-PR diagram table; architectural rule note.

The architectural rule encoded in the system diagram (all I/O via the
libdatadog sidecar) is the same rule Bob applied to PR #3910. See
DataDog/libdatadog#2026 for the sidecar-side support.
leoromanovsky added a commit to DataDog/dd-trace-php that referenced this pull request May 23, 2026
Per Bob's PR review (2026-05-22), the tracer extension must perform no
I/O outside the sidecar. Replaces the raw-socket `AgentExposureTransport`
with `SidecarExposureTransport`, which forwards exposure batches to the
libdatadog sidecar via a new native PHP function `\DDTrace\send_ffe_exposures`
that calls the `ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_exposures` FFI added in
DataDog/libdatadog#2026.

PHP side:

- Delete `Internal/Exposure/AgentExposureTransport.php` (raw socket
  POST to the Agent EVP proxy).
- Add `Internal/Exposure/SidecarExposureTransport.php` that JSON-encodes
  the batch and calls `\DDTrace\send_ffe_exposures()`. Fire-and-forget;
  the sidecar handles retries.
- Update `ExposureWriter::createDefault()` to instantiate the sidecar
  transport.
- Drop the obsolete `testAgentTransportBuildsAgentEvpRequest` PHPUnit
  test (HTTP construction now lives in libdatadog, covered by
  `cargo test -p datadog-sidecar ffe_flusher`).
- Add `Internal/DefaultEvaluationCompletedHook` and
  `Internal/CompositeEvaluationCompletedHook` so production callers go
  through a composite hook factory. In this PR the composite contains
  only `ExposureHook`; the metrics PR (#3911) contributes
  `EvaluationMetricHook` and the file conflict at merge resolves by
  combining both. Update `Client::create()` to call
  `DefaultEvaluationCompletedHook::create()`.

C/Rust bridge:

- Declare `ddog_ByteSlice` (and underlying `ddog_Slice_U8`) in
  `components-rs/common.h` for the metrics path; declare both
  `ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_exposures` and `ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_metrics`
  in `components-rs/sidecar.h`.
- Add C wrappers `ddtrace_sidecar_send_ffe_exposures(zend_string *)`
  and `ddtrace_sidecar_send_ffe_metrics(zend_string *endpoint,
  zend_string *payload_bytes)` in `ext/sidecar.{h,c}` that call the FFI
  with the current sidecar transport + instance id + queue id.
- Declare native PHP functions `\DDTrace\send_ffe_exposures(string): bool`
  and `\DDTrace\send_ffe_metrics(string, string): bool` in
  `ext/ddtrace.stub.php`; add corresponding arginfo entries and
  `ZEND_FUNCTION` registrations in `ext/ddtrace_arginfo.h`; implement
  `PHP_FUNCTION(DDTrace_send_ffe_exposures)` and
  `PHP_FUNCTION(DDTrace_send_ffe_metrics)` in `ext/ddtrace.c`.
- Bump `libdatadog` submodule to FFE branch tip `29762335c` (which
  provides both FFIs). The submodule will be bumped to the libdatadog
  main commit once #2026 merges.

Docs:

- Add `docs/php-ffe-stack/{stack,system}-pr3910.{mmd,png}` for this PR.

Validation:

- `php vendor/bin/phpunit --config phpunit.xml tests/api/Unit/FeatureFlags`
  → 41 tests, 174 assertions, OK.
- libdatadog sidecar tests (`cargo test -p datadog-sidecar ffe_flusher`)
  → 3 passed, on the pinned submodule commit.
- Mermaid PNGs regenerate via `npx @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli`.

`make test_featureflags` and `make test_c TESTS=tests/ext/ffe/...` will
run in CI; running them locally requires rebuilding the extension which
is gated behind libdatadog #2026 merging.
leoromanovsky added a commit to DataDog/dd-trace-php that referenced this pull request May 23, 2026
Adds the M3 evaluation-metrics layer on top of the hook PR (#3909) as a
sibling of the EVP exposures PR (#3910). Records `feature_flag.evaluations`
for both PHP 7 (DD Client hook) and PHP 8 (OpenFeature SDK hook); both
paths share `EvaluationMetricHook::sharedWriter()` for unified
aggregation. OTLP/protobuf payloads are encoded in PHP via the existing
`OtlpMetricEncoder` and delivered to the user-configured OTLP HTTP
metrics intake through the libdatadog sidecar (`ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_metrics`
FFI added in DataDog/libdatadog#2026).

This branch is force-pushed (user-authorized one-time exception to the
no-force-push rule, 2026-05-23) to restructure history away from being
linearly stacked on the M2 exposures PR (#3910). The PR now stacks
directly on the hook PR (#3909) as a sibling of the EVP PR.

PHP side:

- Add `Internal/Metric/EvaluationMetricWriter` with bounded series
  aggregation, drop accounting, and shutdown flush.
- Add `Internal/Metric/EvaluationMetricHook` (DD Client hook) and
  `OtlpMetricEncoder` (PHP 7-safe protobuf encoding).
- Add `Internal/Metric/SidecarOtlpMetricsTransport` that calls
  `\DDTrace\send_ffe_metrics()` (FFI declared in #3910). Endpoint
  resolution: `OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_METRICS_ENDPOINT`, falling back to
  `OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT + /v1/metrics`, default
  `http://localhost:4318/v1/metrics`.
- Add `DDTrace\OpenFeature\EvalMetricsHook` implementing
  `OpenFeature\interfaces\hooks\Hook` (after + error stages), registered
  on `DataDogProvider` via `setHooks()`.
- `DataDogProvider` constructs its internal DD `Client` with
  `DefaultEvaluationCompletedHook::createWithoutMetric()` so the
  OpenFeature path records the metric via the OpenFeature hook (PR 3911
  scope) and NOT via the DD Client hook — preventing double-counting.
  PHP 7 path keeps recording via the DD Client hook.
- Add `Internal/CompositeEvaluationCompletedHook` and
  `Internal/DefaultEvaluationCompletedHook` (metric-only composite).
  This is the merge-conflict point with PR #3910's `[ExposureHook]`
  composite — second merge resolves by combining both hooks.
- Update `Client::create()` to call `DefaultEvaluationCompletedHook::create()`.
- Drop the obsolete `testOtlpTransportBuildsHttpProtobufRequest` PHPUnit
  test (HTTP construction now lives in libdatadog, covered by
  `cargo test -p datadog-sidecar ffe_metrics_flusher`).
- Add `_files_openfeature.php` entry for `EvalMetricsHook.php`.

C/Rust bridge: the `\DDTrace\send_ffe_metrics()` native function, its C
wrapper `ddtrace_sidecar_send_ffe_metrics()`, and the
`ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_metrics` FFI declaration in `components-rs/sidecar.h`
were already added in #3910. This PR's branch picks up those changes
once #3910 merges (or via the same libdatadog submodule pin during
review). For development locally the libdatadog submodule is pinned to
the FFE branch tip (`29762335c`).

Docs:

- Add `docs/php-ffe-stack/{stack,system}-pr3911.{mmd,png}` per the
  4-PR documentation convention.

Validation:

- `php vendor/bin/phpunit --config phpunit.xml tests/api/Unit/FeatureFlags`
  → 40 tests, 160 assertions, OK.
- Mermaid PNGs regenerate via `npx @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli`.

`make test_featureflags`, OpenFeature PHPUnit, and ffe-dogfooding
end-to-end validation will run in CI / are validated separately by
FOLLOW-05 Steps 4–5.
The PHP FFE writers (`SidecarExposureTransport`,
`SidecarOtlpMetricsTransport`) can fire as soon as evaluations begin —
which is often earlier than the first remote-config metadata call that
registers the application against a `QueueId`.

Previously, FFE dispatch lived inside the
`if let Entry::Occupied(entry) = applications.entry(queue_id) { ... }`
block in `enqueue_actions`. That block is only entered after the PHP
runtime has called `set_remote_config_data` or `set_request_config` for
this queue. For shorter-lived PHP processes (parametric test client,
CLI tools, eager evaluators) the FFE batch arrives before the app
registration call lands, so the entire batch was silently dropped.

This change filters `FfeExposures` and `FfeMetrics` actions out of
the action vec before the application-entry gate and dispatches them
directly: both only need session-level state (the trace endpoint /
the user-supplied OTLP endpoint), not per-application telemetry context.

Validated locally with dd-trace-php system-tests parametric
`Test_Feature_Flag_Parametric_Evaluation_Metrics::test_php_ffe_evaluation_metric`,
which now passes (26/27 FFE-scoped tests; remaining failure is the
exposure_event test on a branch that lacks the exposure code path).
Pair the EVP-exposure forwarder name with its sibling `ffe_metrics_flusher`.
The unqualified `ffe_flusher` predates the OTLP-metrics forwarder and the
asymmetry was leaving readers wondering whether `ffe_flusher` was a
parent/umbrella module or a sibling.

Renames the file via `git mv` (preserving blame history) and updates all
references (mod.rs, sidecar_server.rs dispatch arm, ffe_metrics_flusher.rs
cross-reference in the module doc, and the CODEOWNERS entry).

No functional change.
The renamed identifier pushed one debug! line past rustfmt's column
limit. Apply `cargo fmt -p datadog-sidecar -p datadog-sidecar-ffi` to
break the macro across three lines, matching CI's nightly-2026-02-08
rustfmt.
Single architecture diagram showing the end-to-end FFE delivery path
through the sidecar:

  tracer payload → ddog_sidecar_send_ffe_{exposures,metrics} FFI
                 → tarpc enqueue_actions IPC
                 → sidecar_server.rs enqueue_actions handler
                 → FFE filter (lifted out of applications.entry gate, this PR)
                 → ffe_exposures_flusher / ffe_metrics_flusher
                 → NativeCapabilities HTTP client
                 → Agent EVP proxy / OTLP HTTP intake

Uses `flowchart TD` and a quoted YAML title (Mermaid's frontmatter
parser eats unquoted `#` as comments). PNG rendered at 2400×2400
`--scale 3 -b white` for legible PR-page thumbnails.
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2026 13:05
Comment thread datadog-sidecar/src/service/ffe_exposures_flusher.rs
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2026 16:18
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky requested review from dd-oleksii and typotter and removed request for a team May 28, 2026 16:18
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky marked this pull request as draft May 28, 2026 17:30
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2026 00:56
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8be471fbc1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

context: &FfeTelemetryContext<'_>,
exposures: Slice<FfeExposure<'_>>,
) -> MaybeError {
if exposures.is_empty() {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate the exposure slice before calling is_empty

When a C caller passes a malformed Slice such as a null exposures pointer with a non-zero length, this is_empty() call dereferences through Slice::as_slice() and panics before the later try_as_slice() can turn the bad slice into a MaybeError. Because this is an extern "C" entry point, that panic can cross the FFI boundary instead of being reported to the caller; validate with try_as_slice() first (or check the raw length without dereferencing) and then handle the empty case.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sameerank sameerank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the main thing that I'd double check is the panic risk, and the rest are minor/nits. It would also be preferable to hear from another reviewer who knows Rust better

Comment thread datadog-ffe/src/telemetry/exposures.rs
Comment thread datadog-ffe/src/telemetry/exposures.rs
Comment thread datadog-ffe/src/telemetry/exposures.rs Outdated
Comment thread datadog-ffe/src/telemetry/exposures.rs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 11 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants