[DO NOT MERGE] Test fixture: editorial issues for dashboard review composer

[buraizu]

[DO NOT MERGE] Test fixture for docs on-call dashboard

This PR exists only to exercise the docs team dashboard's PR review composer. It intentionally introduces editorial issues into a single FAQ page. Do not merge it. Close it once dashboard testing is finished.

What's here

Five deliberate edits to content/en/metrics/faq/updating-to-distribution-metrics-faq.md, chosen to produce a specific mix of review findings:

Three that should produce inline comments with direct replacement suggestions:

1. Intro paragraph — utilize and in order to (word-list swaps).
2. Nested list item — easily and leverage. This one is indented two spaces on purpose, to verify suggestion blocks preserve leading indentation.
3. Manage Tags paragraph — first-person Our, allows you to, and a passive trailing clause.

Two that should produce general (review-body) comments:

4. A new ## Percentile Configuration Best Practices section — heading breaks the file's question pattern and uses title case instead of sentence case; body is passive throughout and restates content from an earlier section.
5. A bulleted list under the bulk-percentiles section — items are not parallel (imperative, declarative, and a bare noun phrase) with inconsistent capitalization and end punctuation.

No new technical claims are introduced; edits 4 and 5 restate behavior already documented on the page.

Ready for merge

• Ready for merge

[github-actions]

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

• https://docs-staging.datadoghq.com/bryce/oc-dashboard-test/metrics/faq/rollup-for-distributions-with-percentiles
• https://docs-staging.datadoghq.com/bryce/oc-dashboard-test/metrics/faq/updating-to-distribution-metrics-faq

[buraizu]

1. New section restates existing content and breaks the page's heading pattern

Every other heading on this page is phrased as a question, matching the page's FAQ format; this new heading is a title-case noun phrase, breaking both the question pattern and the sentence-case rule for headings. Its content — that custom-metric counts for percentile-enabled distributions are counted like other metric types — already appears earlier on the page in the "How does this new pipeline for Distributions affect me?" section, and the body is written entirely in passive voice.

Suggested fix: Remove this section since it doesn't add new information beyond what's already stated earlier on the page. If it's kept, rephrase the heading as a question in sentence case and rewrite the body in active voice.

---

2. Bulk-configure bullet list is not parallel

The four list items mix grammatical forms (a declarative statement, an imperative instruction, another declarative statement, and a bare noun phrase), and are inconsistent in capitalization and end punctuation — only one item is capitalized and only one ends with a period.

Suggested fix: Confirm that your wildcard pattern matches only the intended metric names.

3. test