Fix inaccurate issue team ownership priority claim - #38635
Open
leomelki wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Correct the Overview section: team attribute and CODEOWNERS are prioritized against each other, while service ownership is a separate, always-applied, dynamic mechanism.
Contributor
Preview links (active after the
|
leomelki
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 12:26
Vomain
self-requested a review
July 31, 2026 16:11
Vomain
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2026
brett0000FF
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do? What is the motivation?
Why
The Issue Team Ownership Overview stated that team attribute, CODEOWNERS, and service ownership were three items in a single priority list. This is inaccurate: service ownership is a separate, always-applied, dynamic mechanism, not just another item competing on priority with the other two.
What
Corrects the Overview: team attribute and CODEOWNERS are prioritized against each other, while service ownership is applied on top of that result and stays dynamically up to date after issue creation.
Merge instructions
Merge readiness:
Additional notes