-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Create puzzle.py #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create puzzle.py #18
Conversation
|
/gemini-review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 Gemini AI Code Review
Found 2 suggestions for improvement:
- 💡 Medium: 2
This review was automatically generated by Gemini AI. Please review the suggestions carefully.
| self.path_cost = path_cost | ||
|
|
||
| class PriorityQueue: | ||
| def __init__(self, f): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PriorityQueue implementation is inefficient.
addusesself.data.sort(key=self.f)which takesO(N log N)time for each addition, whereNis the number of elements in the queue.popusesself.data.pop(0)which takesO(N)time as it involves shifting all subsequent elements.
For search algorithms where the frontier can grow large, this quadratic complexity (O(N^2) or worse for add/pop operations over many iterations) will significantly degrade performance. Python's built-in heapq module provides an efficient min-heap implementation, allowing O(log N) for both add (push) and pop operations.
Consider replacing this custom implementation with heapq for better performance and scalability. For example:
import heapq
import itertools # To ensure stable sorting for equal f_values
class PriorityQueue:
def __init__(self, f):
self.data = [] # Stores (f_value, entry_id, node) tuples
self.f = f
self.counter = itertools.count() # Unique sequence numbers for tie-breaking
def add(self, node):
count = next(self.counter)
heapq.heappush(self.data, (self.f(node), count, node))
def pop(self):
return heapq.heappop(self.data)[2] # Return the node
def top(self):
return self.data[0][2] # Return the node
def is_empty(self):
return len(self.data) == 0|
|
||
| def ACTIONS(self, state): | ||
| r, c = state | ||
| actions = [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The rows and cols variables are currently global. While this works for a single, fixed grid, it can lead to maintainability issues if you need to reuse the Problem class with different grid sizes or in a larger application where globals might conflict.
It's generally better practice to encapsulate grid dimensions within the Problem class itself. You can derive rows and cols from self.grid in the Problem's __init__ method and then use self.rows and self.cols throughout the class and in functions like BEST_FIRST_SEARCH.
Suggestion:
-
Update
Problem.__init__:class Problem: def __init__(self, initial, goal, grid): self.initial = initial self.goal = goal self.grid = grid self.rows = len(grid) self.cols = len(grid[0]) if grid else 0 # Handle empty grid case
-
Update
Problem.ACTIONS:# ... if 0 <= nr < self.rows and 0 <= nc < self.cols: # ...
-
Update
BEST_FIRST_SEARCH:# ... reached = [[None for _ in range(problem.cols)] for _ in range(problem.rows)] # ...
This approach makes the Problem class more self-contained and robust.
No description provided.