Skip to content

Conversation

@greenratextra1-create
Copy link

No description provided.

@greenratextra1-create
Copy link
Author

/gemini-review

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Gemini AI Code Review

Found 2 suggestions for improvement:

  • 💡 Medium: 2

This review was automatically generated by Gemini AI. Please review the suggestions carefully.

self.path_cost = path_cost

class PriorityQueue:
def __init__(self, f):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PriorityQueue implementation is inefficient.

  • add uses self.data.sort(key=self.f) which takes O(N log N) time for each addition, where N is the number of elements in the queue.
  • pop uses self.data.pop(0) which takes O(N) time as it involves shifting all subsequent elements.

For search algorithms where the frontier can grow large, this quadratic complexity (O(N^2) or worse for add/pop operations over many iterations) will significantly degrade performance. Python's built-in heapq module provides an efficient min-heap implementation, allowing O(log N) for both add (push) and pop operations.

Consider replacing this custom implementation with heapq for better performance and scalability. For example:

import heapq
import itertools # To ensure stable sorting for equal f_values

class PriorityQueue:
    def __init__(self, f):
        self.data = []  # Stores (f_value, entry_id, node) tuples
        self.f = f
        self.counter = itertools.count() # Unique sequence numbers for tie-breaking

    def add(self, node):
        count = next(self.counter)
        heapq.heappush(self.data, (self.f(node), count, node))

    def pop(self):
        return heapq.heappop(self.data)[2] # Return the node

    def top(self):
        return self.data[0][2] # Return the node

    def is_empty(self):
        return len(self.data) == 0


def ACTIONS(self, state):
r, c = state
actions = []

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rows and cols variables are currently global. While this works for a single, fixed grid, it can lead to maintainability issues if you need to reuse the Problem class with different grid sizes or in a larger application where globals might conflict.

It's generally better practice to encapsulate grid dimensions within the Problem class itself. You can derive rows and cols from self.grid in the Problem's __init__ method and then use self.rows and self.cols throughout the class and in functions like BEST_FIRST_SEARCH.

Suggestion:

  1. Update Problem.__init__:

    class Problem:
        def __init__(self, initial, goal, grid):
            self.initial = initial
            self.goal = goal
            self.grid = grid
            self.rows = len(grid)
            self.cols = len(grid[0]) if grid else 0 # Handle empty grid case
  2. Update Problem.ACTIONS:

    # ...
            if 0 <= nr < self.rows and 0 <= nc < self.cols:
    # ...
  3. Update BEST_FIRST_SEARCH:

    # ...
        reached = [[None for _ in range(problem.cols)] for _ in range(problem.rows)]
    # ...

This approach makes the Problem class more self-contained and robust.

@pradeeban pradeeban closed this Feb 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants