You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When |X| and |Y| are the cardinalities of the two sets. Inspired by this concept, we adapted the perspective of viewing signals to employ the Dice Coefficient as a comparative metric between two signals. Simply put, if the integral difference between two signals is zero, they can be considered identical. Given two signals? functions $E(\cdot)$ and $R(\cdot)$, defined as
$H(\cdot)$ is Heaviside function, $t \in T$ is given time. our objective is to optimize $SDSC(\cdot)$ to 1. While straightforward, this concept poses challenges for the continuous and complex nature of EEG signals. EEG signals, characterized by their waveform patterns, are continuous and irregular yet always sampled at a constant rate. This means our data can be understood as continuous but discretely interpretable, necessitating a redefinition of the problem. Rather than calculating the integral difference between two signals, we can understand the task as making the sampled signals at the same moment have the same intensity.
$s \in S$ represents discrete sampling points in time, then set $S \subset T$. $SDSC(s)$ can approximate $SDSC(t)$ from the observed values and is easier by converting integration into addition operations. Unlike MSE, SDSC depends on signal intensity, making it more sensitive to data peaks