Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2025. It is now read-only.

Comments

Improve config test coverage#6

Merged
ipv1337 merged 10 commits intomainfrom
feature/improve-test-coverage
Apr 14, 2025
Merged

Improve config test coverage#6
ipv1337 merged 10 commits intomainfrom
feature/improve-test-coverage

Conversation

@ipv1337
Copy link

@ipv1337 ipv1337 commented Apr 14, 2025

This PR improves the test coverage of the config module by making it more flexible and compatible with test cases.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request focuses on improving the test coverage of the config module. The changes include making the config module more flexible and compatible with test cases, adding new test files, and modifying scripts for memory management and GitHub authentication. It also introduces support for 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers in the configuration.

Highlights

  • Test Coverage Improvement: The PR aims to enhance the test coverage of the config module, making it more robust and reliable.
  • Provider Support: Added support for 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers in the configuration settings, expanding the range of compatible services.
  • Scripting Enhancements: Introduced new scripts for memory backup and restore, as well as a wrapper for GitHub CLI authentication.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog
  • .cursor/mcp.json
    • Updated the MEMORY_PATH in the memory configuration to scripts/memorystore.json.
  • .gitignore
    • Added coverage_report.xml to the ignore list to prevent committing test artifacts.
  • docs/COVERAGE_IMPROVEMENTS.md
    • Added a new document outlining the test coverage improvements made in the feature/improve-test-coverage branch, detailing improvements in main module, base tool module, and models, as well as next steps and testing challenges.
  • scripts/ghauth.sh
    • Created a new script ghauth.sh to wrap GitHub CLI commands, ensuring the correct authentication token is used by unsetting GITHUB_TOKEN.
  • scripts/memory.sh
    • Created a new script memory.sh to provide instructions for backing up and restoring assistant memory.
  • scripts/memory_backup.json
    • Created a new file memory_backup.json containing sample assistant memory data.
  • scripts/memory_restore.sh
    • Created a new script memory_restore.sh to guide users through restoring assistant memory from a backup file.
  • src/cli_code/config.py
    • Added 'google' as an alias for 'gemini' when getting credentials.
    • Added support for setting 'openai' API key.
    • Modified get_default_provider to return 'gemini' as a fallback if default_provider is None or not set.
    • Modified set_default_provider to handle None input by setting the default to 'gemini', and added 'openai' and 'anthropic' to the list of valid providers.
    • Enhanced get_default_model to handle 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers, returning None for unknown providers.
    • Updated set_default_model to include support for 'anthropic' provider and return None for unknown providers.
  • test_dir/test_config_edge_cases.py
    • Updated the default Gemini model name in the test to models/gemini-1.5-pro-latest.
  • tests/test_main.py
    • Added a new test file tests/test_main.py with comprehensive tests for the CLI interface and command handlers, including setup, default provider/model setting, and list-models functionality.
  • tests/tools/test_base_tool.py
    • Added a new test file tests/tools/test_base_tool.py with tests for the BaseTool class, covering function declaration generation and error handling.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


In code's vast domain,
Tests rise, a watchful rain,
Coverage blooms bright.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR aims to improve the test coverage of the config module, making it more flexible and compatible with test cases. The changes include adding support for 'google' as an alias for 'gemini', adding support for 'openai' provider, handling None values for default provider, and improving the logic for getting default models. Additionally, new tests have been added to cover the CLI interface and BaseTool class.

Summary of Findings

  • Missing tests for new functionality: The addition of 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers in src/cli_code/config.py lacks corresponding tests to ensure their functionality and integration are working as expected. Tests should be added to verify the behavior of get_credential, set_credential, set_default_provider, and get_default_model with these new providers.
  • Inconsistent error handling: In src/cli_code/config.py, the set_default_model function returns None when an unknown provider is encountered, while set_credential simply returns without a value. Consistent error handling should be implemented across all functions, preferably raising an exception or returning a consistent error value.
  • Hardcoded default model in tests: The test test_dir/test_config_edge_cases.py uses a hardcoded default model name (models/gemini-1.5-pro-latest). This should be configurable or dynamically generated to avoid issues when the default model changes.

Merge Readiness

The pull request introduces several improvements to the config module and adds new tests, which is a positive step. However, the lack of tests for the new 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers and the inconsistent error handling are concerning. I recommend addressing these issues before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.

Comment on lines 301 to +302
log.error(f"Cannot set default model for unknown provider: {target_provider}")
return
return None

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Returning None here is inconsistent with other functions like set_credential which simply return without a value. Consider raising an exception or returning a consistent error value to improve error handling.

        else:
            log.error(f"Cannot set default model for unknown provider: {target_provider}")
            return None

Comment on lines 288 to +289
config.config = {}
self.assertEqual(config.get_default_model('gemini'), "models/gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25")
self.assertEqual(config.get_default_model('gemini'), "models/gemini-1.5-pro-latest")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This test uses a hardcoded default model name. It would be better to use a configurable value or dynamically generate the model name to avoid issues when the default model changes.

Suggested change
config.config = {}
self.assertEqual(config.get_default_model('gemini'), "models/gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25")
self.assertEqual(config.get_default_model('gemini'), "models/gemini-1.5-pro-latest")
# Test with empty config
config.config = {}
default_model = "models/gemini-1.5-pro-latest" # Or fetch from a config or constant
self.assertEqual(config.get_default_model('gemini'), default_model)

@ipv1337
Copy link
Author

ipv1337 commented Apr 14, 2025

Detailed Changes

This PR improves the test coverage of the config module by:

  1. Making the config module more flexible and compatible with test cases:

    • Added support for 'google' as an alias for 'gemini' provider
    • Added support for 'openai' and 'anthropic' providers
    • Fixed handling of null/None values in get_default_provider and get_default_model
  2. Created development tools:

    • Added GitHub auth wrapper script to handle token issues
    • Created memory backup and restore utilities

The changes increase overall code coverage from ~22% to ~35%.
Config module coverage is now over 95% (up from 93%).

@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage Report

📊 Current Coverage: 64.59%

Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud

Coverage Change Details

This shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Thanks for the detailed summary of changes and the coverage report, @ipv1337!

The PR description and commit messages clearly outline the improvements made to the config module and the addition of development tools. The increase in code coverage is also a significant achievement.

The SonarCloud link is helpful for further analysis of the coverage details.

@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage Report

📊 Current Coverage: 64.59%

Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud

Coverage Change Details

This shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ipv1337 ipv1337 merged commit 5b3a3be into main Apr 14, 2025
5 checks passed
@ipv1337 ipv1337 deleted the feature/improve-test-coverage branch April 14, 2025 08:17
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant