Skip to content

feat(wasm-utxo): support multi-recipient Ironwood shielded outputs - #367

Merged
veetragjain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
veetragjain/cshld-1529-support-multi-recipient-ironwood-shielded-outputs
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

feat(wasm-utxo): support multi-recipient Ironwood shielded outputs#367
veetragjain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
veetragjain/cshld-1529-support-multi-recipient-ironwood-shielded-outputs

Conversation

@veetragjain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket: CSHLD-1529

@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CSHLD-1529

@veetragjain
veetragjain force-pushed the veetragjain/cshld-1529-support-multi-recipient-ironwood-shielded-outputs branch 3 times, most recently from 623aa08 to 6b6f417 Compare August 21, 2026 15:01
@veetragjain
veetragjain force-pushed the veetragjain/cshld-1529-support-multi-recipient-ironwood-shielded-outputs branch from 6b6f417 to b382384 Compare August 21, 2026 15:04
@veetragjain
veetragjain marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2026 15:16
@veetragjain
veetragjain requested review from a team as code owners August 21, 2026 15:16
@veetragjain
veetragjain enabled auto-merge August 21, 2026 16:25
Comment on lines +596 to +597
use crate::fixed_script_wallet::bitgo_psbt::zcash_psbt::IronwoodOutputRequest;
use crate::zcash::ironwood_build::{AnchorBytes, ANCHOR_SIZE};

@abhi-bitgo abhi-bitgo Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: is there a reason for not importing at the top and doing it inline? I feel like we can move this to the top


impl TryFromJsValue for crate::fixed_script_wallet::bitgo_psbt::zcash_psbt::IronwoodOutputRequest {
fn try_from_js_value(item: &JsValue) -> Result<Self, WasmUtxoError> {
use crate::zcash::ironwood_build::{MemoBytes, OrchardAddressBytes, OvkBytes};

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as above

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, will do it in next PR

@veetragjain
veetragjain merged commit 7a55dea into master Aug 24, 2026
13 checks passed
@veetragjain
veetragjain deleted the veetragjain/cshld-1529-support-multi-recipient-ironwood-shielded-outputs branch August 24, 2026 05:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants