Nanobind migration POC

[soswow]

Draft PR where I am exploring migration from pybind11 to nanobind.

New env flag introduced OIIO_PYTHON_BINDINGS_BACKEND = pybind11 or nanobind or both

Select which Python binding backend(s) to configure. both keeps the existing pybind11 module and also builds the experimental nanobind module.

When it is nanobine one is build it is in PyOpenImageIONanobindExperimental target.

cmake --fresh -S . -B build \
  -DUSE_CCACHE=OFF \
  -Dfmt_DIR=/opt/homebrew/lib/cmake/fmt \
  -DOpenColorIO_DIR=/opt/homebrew/lib/cmake/OpenColorIO \
  -DOIIO_INTERNALIZE_FMT=ON \
  -DOIIO_PYTHON_BINDINGS_BACKEND=both

Checklist:

• I have read the guidelines on contributions and code review procedures.
• I have updated the documentation if my PR adds features or changes
  behavior.
• I am sure that this PR's changes are tested somewhere in the
  testsuite.
• I have run and passed the testsuite in CI before submitting the
  PR, by pushing the changes to my fork and seeing that the automated CI
  passed there. (Exceptions: If most tests pass and you can't figure out why
  the remaining ones fail, it's ok to submit the PR and ask for help. Or if
  any failures seem entirely unrelated to your change; sometimes things break
  on the GitHub runners.)
• My code follows the prevailing code style of this project and I
  fixed any problems reported by the clang-format CI test.
• If I added or modified a public C++ API call, I have also amended the
  corresponding Python bindings. If altering ImageBufAlgo functions, I also
  exposed the new functionality as oiiotool options.