First, thanks a lot for adding this so quickly after #86.
Now that #101 landed, I wanted to ask whether it might make sense to adjust the naming or docs a bit to make the broader use case more visible.
Right now @oxc-angular/vite sounds very Vite-specific, even though it can now also be used with rolldown / tsdown to generate Angular libraries.
Maybe this is something that could be improved through docs/examples, or maybe through naming that better reflects that it is not only useful in Vite app setups.
The main point is discoverability: people may otherwise not realize that this now also covers library build workflows.
Anyway, thanks for the great work.