{item.title}
- {item.badge} - {item.status} -{item.title}
+ {item.badge} + {item.status} +{item.desc}
+{item.desc}
-diff --git a/public/theses/phd-thesis-comparing-blockchains.pdf b/public/theses/phd-thesis-comparing-blockchains.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..471ada8 Binary files /dev/null and b/public/theses/phd-thesis-comparing-blockchains.pdf differ diff --git a/src/components/cv/TimeLine.astro b/src/components/cv/TimeLine.astro index dfdac36..f4e2211 100644 --- a/src/components/cv/TimeLine.astro +++ b/src/components/cv/TimeLine.astro @@ -15,9 +15,10 @@ const variants = { }; const color = variants[variant] ?? variants.primary; +const isPhdThesis = title === "PhD in Blockchain & Distributed Ledger Technology"; --- -
+
{item.desc}
+{item.desc}
-{item.desc}
+{item.desc}
-+ This doctoral dissertation develops a multidimensional and context-aware + approach to comparing blockchain systems. It studies how protocol design, + network topology, workloads, deployment conditions, and economic structure + shape performance, energy use, experimental stability, and economic + efficiency. +
+ +Author
+Vincenzo P. Di Perna
+Institution
+Università degli Studi di Camerino
+School of Advanced Studies
+Doctoral course
+Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology
+Curriculum: Economics and Finance
+Public defense
+23 June 2026
+Scientific field: INF/01
++ The dissertation is also archived in the institutional research repository + of the University of Camerino. +
+5
+blockchain systems
+5
+network topologies
+6
+workload profiles
+4
+evaluation dimensions
++ Blockchain efficiency cannot be represented by a single headline metric. + Results depend on the interaction between protocol design, network + conditions, workload semantics, infrastructure, and the economic ecosystem. + Comparisons based only on average transactions per second can therefore hide + variability, deployment assumptions, energy trade-offs, and structural + differences between crypto-assets. +
+ ++ The dissertation addresses this evidence gap through controlled benchmarking, + repeated measurements, energy instrumentation, openly documented artifacts, + and an entropy-based aggregation of economic indicators. +
+{item.text}
++ The technical studies compare Algorand, Diem, Ethereum Clique, Quorum IBFT, + and Solana under five logical network topologies: fat-tree, full mesh, + hypercube, scale-free, and torus. The systems are exercised with transfer and + smart-contract workloads inspired by DDoS, FIFA, GAFAM, gaming, PayPal, and + VISA scenarios, using both 10-node and 40-node configurations. +
+ +Supervisor
+Prof. Marco Bernardo
+University of Urbino
+Co-supervisors
+Prof. Francesco Fabris
+University of Trieste
+Prof. Valerio Schiavoni
+University of Neuchâtel
+{item.text}
+ +