Use Case
Currently retainFiles() receive files and then save the files to S3 after retaining.
In our case our files are already in S3.
It would be more efficient to be able to retain directly from S3, e.g. retainFiles("s3 url").
Problem Statement
sending files in the retainFiles() call can be a problem when
a)files are too big
b)numerous files 10K+
c)result in double storage if the files originates from S3
How This Feature Would Help
efficiently retain files from S3
Proposed Solution
No response
Alternatives Considered
No response
Priority
Nice to have
Additional Context
No response
Checklist
Use Case
Currently retainFiles() receive files and then save the files to S3 after retaining.
In our case our files are already in S3.
It would be more efficient to be able to retain directly from S3, e.g. retainFiles("s3 url").
Problem Statement
sending files in the retainFiles() call can be a problem when
a)files are too big
b)numerous files 10K+
c)result in double storage if the files originates from S3
How This Feature Would Help
efficiently retain files from S3
Proposed Solution
No response
Alternatives Considered
No response
Priority
Nice to have
Additional Context
No response
Checklist