Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (30 loc) · 2.59 KB

File metadata and controls

43 lines (30 loc) · 2.59 KB

Repository usage and priorities

This document contains concise rules for how agents should inspect and use this project.

Priority and Workflow

  1. Read README.md first — It is the primary source for the project's purpose, setup, and quick start.
  2. Review docs/ in order — The documentation contains conceptual decisions and usage examples:
    • USERGUIDE.md: Core concepts and YAML structure.
    • API.md: Programmatic usage.
    • YAML_SPEC.md: Detailed schema for evaluation files.
    • FIXTURES.md: How to use and generate test data.
  3. Check examples/ — Practical examples, eval definitions, and usage scenarios.
  4. Inspect db_fixture.yml and db.py — Example fixtures and data structures used by tests.

Production Guidance

  • Core Logic: For production-grade specs or evaluation work, use skills/vowel-core.
  • Context: Refer to skills/vowel-core/resources/EVAL_SPEC_CONTEXT.md for production context and guidance.

Development & Testing

  • Run Tests: Execute pytest to ensure the environment is stable before making changes.
  • Validation: Use vowel-schema.json to validate any new YAML evaluation specs.
  • Consistency: Keep new evals or specs consistent with existing patterns in examples/ and docs/.

Quick Tips

  • Use the CLI for watching changes: vowel watch <file>.
  • If you have questions or uncertainty, consult README.md and the relevant docs pages.
  • Check TODO for pending tasks or known issues.

Critical Thinking & Intellectual Honesty

  • Never defer to the user's idea just because they said it. Evaluate every proposal — yours or the user's — on its own merits: trade-offs, costs, complexity, correctness.
  • If the user's idea has flaws, say so. Explain why with concrete reasoning (performance, token cost, latency, maintainability, correctness risk). Do not soften criticism to be agreeable.
  • If your own idea has flaws, admit it first. Don't wait for the user to find the holes. Present disadvantages upfront.
  • When comparing approaches, use structured analysis: list pros/cons for each, identify the real trade-offs, and state which you'd pick and why — before asking for input.
  • "You're right" must be earned. If you catch yourself agreeing immediately, stop and ask: "Did I actually evaluate this, or am I just being agreeable?" If the latter, go back and do the analysis.
  • The user is a collaborator, not an authority. Good ideas win regardless of who proposed them. Bad ideas lose regardless of who proposed them.

These rules help agents use the project consistently and safely.