Summary
Running a capability through an embedder SDK (Rust traverse-embedder / Web traverse-embedder-web) requires packaging it as an application bundle (app.manifest.json) — a materially different, more involved manifest than the capability-level agent_package manifest, since it includes a state machine, placement policy, and public-surface declarations. There's no canonical schema doc for this format; the only guidance available is reverse-engineering existing example files (e.g. examples/applications/traverse-starter/app.manifest.json in traverse-framework/traverse).
Evidence
Confirmed traverse-cli app new exists (Command::AppNew { app_id, register, workspace_id } in traverse-cli/src/main.rs), but did not verify what it actually scaffolds — a complete, ready-to-fill app.manifest.json, or a minimal stub — while documenting a Claude Skill for building Traverse apps end-to-end, since no schema reference exists to check its output against.
Impact
Someone who has successfully authored, compiled, and validated (agent inspect) a capability has no documented path from there to "package it so an embedder can actually run it" — the gap between capability-level validation and real execution is currently bridged only by reading example files and guessing at field names.
Suggested fix
Publish a schema reference for app.manifest.json (mirroring the level of detail already available for capability contracts elsewhere in the docs), and confirm/document exactly what traverse-cli app new scaffolds today.
Summary
Running a capability through an embedder SDK (Rust
traverse-embedder/ Webtraverse-embedder-web) requires packaging it as an application bundle (app.manifest.json) — a materially different, more involved manifest than the capability-levelagent_packagemanifest, since it includes a state machine, placement policy, and public-surface declarations. There's no canonical schema doc for this format; the only guidance available is reverse-engineering existing example files (e.g.examples/applications/traverse-starter/app.manifest.jsonin traverse-framework/traverse).Evidence
Confirmed
traverse-cli app newexists (Command::AppNew { app_id, register, workspace_id }intraverse-cli/src/main.rs), but did not verify what it actually scaffolds — a complete, ready-to-fill app.manifest.json, or a minimal stub — while documenting a Claude Skill for building Traverse apps end-to-end, since no schema reference exists to check its output against.Impact
Someone who has successfully authored, compiled, and validated (
agent inspect) a capability has no documented path from there to "package it so an embedder can actually run it" — the gap between capability-level validation and real execution is currently bridged only by reading example files and guessing at field names.Suggested fix
Publish a schema reference for app.manifest.json (mirroring the level of detail already available for capability contracts elsewhere in the docs), and confirm/document exactly what
traverse-cli app newscaffolds today.