RFC 3476 was recently submitted, which contains many of the same desires as the draft RFC on named function types in this repo.
Would it be welcome if I opened a few PRs to that RFC text, to help move the initiative forwards? As an example of a change I'd make, I think it makes sense to talk about function item types instead of "function definitions" / "fndef", as the RFC text currently does.
RFC 3476 was recently submitted, which contains many of the same desires as the draft RFC on named function types in this repo.
Would it be welcome if I opened a few PRs to that RFC text, to help move the initiative forwards? As an example of a change I'd make, I think it makes sense to talk about function item types instead of "function definitions" / "fndef", as the RFC text currently does.