Proposal
change the visit methods of TypeFoldable and TypeVisitor to use std::ops::ControlFlow<()> instead of bool. In the future we may change the used type to std::ops::ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> but this is not part of this MCP for now. [ed: updated the type signatures post rust-lang/rust#76614]
This makes it more intuitive and means that we can stop adding comments like false // keep visiting, for example in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9832374f6e378971e1a933362cf9781b121bb845/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/opaque_types.rs#L696.
Mentors or Reviewers
If you have a reviewer or mentor in mind for this work, mention then
here. You can put your own name here if you are planning to mentor the
work.
Process
The main points of the Major Change Process is as follows:
You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.
Comments
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.
Proposal
change the
visitmethods ofTypeFoldableandTypeVisitorto usestd::ops::ControlFlow<()>instead ofbool. In the future we may change the used type tostd::ops::ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy>but this is not part of this MCP for now. [ed: updated the type signatures post rust-lang/rust#76614]This makes it more intuitive and means that we can stop adding comments like
false // keep visiting, for example in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9832374f6e378971e1a933362cf9781b121bb845/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/opaque_types.rs#L696.Mentors or Reviewers
If you have a reviewer or mentor in mind for this work, mention then
here. You can put your own name here if you are planning to mentor the
work.
Process
The main points of the Major Change Process is as follows:
@rustbot second.-C flag, then full team check-off is required.@rfcbot fcp mergeon either the MCP or the PR.You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.
Comments
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.