Multiple images only access as Selkies #130
Replies: 5 comments
-
|
Selkies is the remove desktop tech that's used to access/display the gui application in the web browser. Deploy container then access via the https port as explained in the readme. Also, dockhand isn't one of our container. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It didn't work. both lollypop and doublecommander say to access with https and says that it ships with a self signed cert for it, but my browser says "ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR.' I'll try another browser, but for some reason I'm not getting the cert. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes that's correct, you just have to tell your browser to accept the self signed cert. We can't just bundle a signed cert, they don't work like that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't get the link that lets me "proceed to 192.168.1.250 (potentially unsafe" I just get that https error. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Then you need to figure out how to get your browser to allow it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm trying to setup a docker media server on Proxmox 9.2.2. I'm having problems with several images (lollypop, doublecommander, dockhand) from linuxserver. They seem to pull correctly from the propper linuxserver locations, so it doesn't appear that anything is getting corrupted in the process. But when I try to access them, they only come up as Selkies. I know that Selkies does not equal lollypop, doublecommander or dockhand. I saw the github page that explains that selkies replaces KasmVNC. I don't know anything about either Selkies or KasmVNC, I would just like to know how to access my app(s) as the port for the docker I'm trying to run is intercepted by selkies.
Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions