use goroutine pool to concurrent forgetinode

in #30 forgetinode was changed into inline ServerOps, this may solove
memory oom, but the performance of rm op will be very slow, and it will
also hang other ops, so i think add a goroutine pool to limit the max
num of forgetinode goroutines, but not affect the performance

Author: kungf

fuseutil/file_system.go

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import (
 
 	"github.com/jacobsa/fuse"
 	"github.com/jacobsa/fuse/fuseops"
+	"github.com/panjf2000/ants/v2"
 )
 
 // An interface with a method for each op type in the fuseops package. This can
@@ -93,6 +94,12 @@ type fileSystemServer struct {
 	opsInFlight sync.WaitGroup
 }
 
+type opCtx struct {
+	c   *fuse.Connection
+	ctx context.Context
+	op  interface{}
+}
+
 func (s *fileSystemServer) ServeOps(c *fuse.Connection) {
 	// When we are done, we clean up by waiting for all in-flight ops then
 	// destroying the file system.
@@ -101,6 +108,17 @@ func (s *fileSystemServer) ServeOps(c *fuse.Connection) {
 		s.fs.Destroy()
 	}()
 
+	// forget inode ops, which may come in a
+	// flurry from the kernel and we should
+	// make a pool to limit the number of goroutines
+	// one goroutine 2KB, 10w goroutine max 200MB
+	p, _ := ants.NewPoolWithFunc(100000, func(i interface{}) {
+		op := i.(opCtx)
+		s.handleOp(op.c, op.ctx, op.op)
+	})
+
+	defer p.Release()
+
 	for {
 		ctx, op, err := c.ReadOp()
 		if err == io.EOF {
@@ -113,11 +131,12 @@ func (s *fileSystemServer) ServeOps(c *fuse.Connection) {
 
 		s.opsInFlight.Add(1)
 		if _, ok := op.(*fuseops.ForgetInodeOp); ok {
-			// Special case: call in this goroutine for
-			// forget inode ops, which may come in a
-			// flurry from the kernel and are generally
-			// cheap for the file system to handle
-			s.handleOp(c, ctx, op)
+			op := &opCtx{
+				c:   c,
+				ctx: ctx,
+				op:  op,
+			}
+			p.Invoke(op)
 		} else {
 			go s.handleOp(c, ctx, op)
 		}