-
|
I've noticed that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
@pearigee @codyoss Could you please take a look when you have a moment? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
From the way you described it, I’d expect the important distinction now to be:
So if your PR was merged before archival but never made it into a published package release, I wouldnt assume it is lost — more likely it now depends on whether that change was carried into the monorepo branch / release pipeline that owns the package going forward. In other words, the code may be merged historically, but until it gets included in the release path that now publishes So I think the real maintainer-side question is probly:
If not, then the practical next step would probly be to identify the exact merged PR/commit and confirm whether it was transferred into the handwritten monorepo location after the archive move. So I’d guess this is less “the change disappeared” and more “the release ownership moved, and it needs confirmation that the merged commit made it into the new release pipeline.” |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I can see your commit here: dfca9d9
So if it has not been released it should still be in the next release. Hope that helps!