Alert IDs:
- 85d46a9b-c510-408f-b69e-df4048d0e131
- d09d995f-63aa-452b-b1ec-f87ad44f5bd2
Vulnerabilities in brace-expansion
Release: New release
Total Vulnerabilities: 2
Severity: MEDIUM (Score: 5.3)
Description:
Impact
A brace pattern with a zero step value (e.g., {1..2..0}) causes the sequence generation loop to run indefinitely, making the process hang for seconds and allocate heaps of memory.
The loop in question:
https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184
test() is one of
https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113
The increment is computed as Math.abs(0) = 0, so the loop variable never advances. On a test machine, the process hangs for about 3.5 seconds and allocates roughly 1.9 GB of memory before throwing a RangeError. Setting max to any value has no effect because the limit is only checked at the output combination step, not during sequence generation.
This affects any application that passes untrusted strings to expand(), or by error sets a step value of 0. That includes tools built on minimatch/glob that resolve patterns from CLI arguments or config files. The input needed is just 10 bytes.
Patches
Upgrade to versions
A step increment of 0 is now sanitized to 1, which matches bash behavior.
Workarounds
Sanitize strings passed to expand() to ensure a step value of 0 is not used.
Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33750
Alert ID: 85d46a9b-c510-408f-b69e-df4048d0e131
Severity: HIGH (Score: 4.8)
Description:
Summary
brace-expansion's expand() exhibits exponential-time - O(2ⁿ) - behavior in the number of consecutive non-expanding {} groups. A short, all-ASCII input (~90 bytes/30 groups) blocks the calling thread for minutes; a slightly longer input hangs it effectively indefinitely. Because the dominant consumers run on Node's single-threaded event loop, one small input can fully stall a worker/process.
In expand_, post is computed unconditionally at the top of the function, before the early-return branches that don't use it:
const post = m.post.length ? expand_(m.post, max, false) : ['']; // always recurses
...
if (!isSequence && !isOptions) {
if (m.post.match(/,(?!,).*\}/)) {
str = m.pre + '{' + m.body + escClose + m.post;
return expand_(str, max, true); // restart — `post` discarded
}
return [str];
}
For input like a{},{},…, the first {} is non-expanding, so control reaches the {a},b} rewrite branch - but expand_ has already recursed into post over the entire remaining tail, only to throw the result away.
Each level therefore spawns two recursive expansions over essentially the same remaining work: T(n) = 2·T(n−1) ⇒ O(2ⁿ).
The max option does not mitigate this: max only bounds the output-building loops; neither the post recursion nor the rewrite recursion consults it.
Measured on 5.0.6:
| groups (n) |
input bytes |
time |
| 20 |
60 |
130 ms |
| 24 |
72 |
1.9 s |
| 26 |
78 |
7.8 s |
| 30 (PoC) |
90 |
~2 min |
Proof of concept
const { expand } = require('brace-expansion');
// 30 non-expanding groups, ~90 bytes — blocks for minutes:
expand('a{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{}');
Impact
Any application that passes attacker-influenced strings to brace-expansion.expand() - directly or transitively via minimatch/glob brace patterns - can be driven into a multi-minute-to-indefinite CPU hang by a tiny request, denying service on that thread/process.
Remediation
Upgrade to a patched release. The fix:
- Defers computing post until after the early-return branches (and computes it locally in the $-suffix branch), so post is only expanded when a brace set actually expands and the value is used. This alone removes the exponential.
- Converts the {a},b} rewrite from recursion to an in-function loop, so a long run of rewrites cannot grow the call stack.
Verified: the PoC drops from ~2 min to 0.55 ms, 5,000 groups complete in ~344 ms, and output is identical to 5.0.6 across a behavioral-equivalence suite (sequences, padding, $-prefix, a{},b}c, {},a}b, x{{a,b}}y, etc.). Post-fix complexity is ~O(n²) on this input class - acceptable for the security fix; a linear rewrite can be a non-urgent follow-up.
If immediate upgrade isn't possible, avoid passing untrusted input to expand() / glob brace patterns, or run such expansion under a timeout/worker.
Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13149
Alert ID: d09d995f-63aa-452b-b1ec-f87ad44f5bd2
Alert IDs:
Vulnerabilities in brace-expansion
Release: New release
Total Vulnerabilities: 2
1. CVE-2026-33750
Severity: MEDIUM (Score: 5.3)
Description:
Impact
A brace pattern with a zero step value (e.g.,
{1..2..0}) causes the sequence generation loop to run indefinitely, making the process hang for seconds and allocate heaps of memory.The loop in question:
https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184
test()is one ofhttps://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113
The increment is computed as
Math.abs(0) = 0, so the loop variable never advances. On a test machine, the process hangs for about 3.5 seconds and allocates roughly 1.9 GB of memory before throwing aRangeError. Setting max to any value has no effect because the limit is only checked at the output combination step, not during sequence generation.This affects any application that passes untrusted strings to expand(), or by error sets a step value of
0. That includes tools built on minimatch/glob that resolve patterns from CLI arguments or config files. The input needed is just 10 bytes.Patches
Upgrade to versions
A step increment of 0 is now sanitized to 1, which matches bash behavior.
Workarounds
Sanitize strings passed to
expand()to ensure a step value of0is not used.Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33750
Alert ID: 85d46a9b-c510-408f-b69e-df4048d0e131
2. CVE-2026-13149
Severity: HIGH (Score: 4.8)
Description:
Summary
brace-expansion's expand() exhibits exponential-time - O(2ⁿ) - behavior in the number of consecutive non-expanding {} groups. A short, all-ASCII input (~90 bytes/30 groups) blocks the calling thread for minutes; a slightly longer input hangs it effectively indefinitely. Because the dominant consumers run on Node's single-threaded event loop, one small input can fully stall a worker/process.
In
expand_,postis computed unconditionally at the top of the function, before the early-return branches that don't use it:For input like a{},{},…, the first {} is non-expanding, so control reaches the {a},b} rewrite branch - but
expand_has already recursed into post over the entire remaining tail, only to throw the result away.Each level therefore spawns two recursive expansions over essentially the same remaining work:
T(n) = 2·T(n−1) ⇒ O(2ⁿ).The max option does not mitigate this: max only bounds the output-building loops; neither the post recursion nor the rewrite recursion consults it.
Measured on 5.0.6:
Proof of concept
Impact
Any application that passes attacker-influenced strings to brace-expansion.expand() - directly or transitively via minimatch/glob brace patterns - can be driven into a multi-minute-to-indefinite CPU hang by a tiny request, denying service on that thread/process.
Remediation
Upgrade to a patched release. The fix:
Verified: the PoC drops from ~2 min to 0.55 ms, 5,000 groups complete in ~344 ms, and output is identical to 5.0.6 across a behavioral-equivalence suite (sequences, padding, $-prefix, a{},b}c, {},a}b, x{{a,b}}y, etc.). Post-fix complexity is ~O(n²) on this input class - acceptable for the security fix; a linear rewrite can be a non-urgent follow-up.
If immediate upgrade isn't possible, avoid passing untrusted input to expand() / glob brace patterns, or run such expansion under a timeout/worker.
Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13149
Alert ID: d09d995f-63aa-452b-b1ec-f87ad44f5bd2