You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To make FatPy useful for practical engineering design, we should consider implementing calculation methods based on common fatigue design standards or guidelines.
Which norms do you think are most important for FatPy to incorporate methods from? Examples could include:
FKM Guideline (Analytical Strength Assessment)
Eurocode 3 (Steel Structures - Fatigue Aspects)
DVS 1612 (Welded Aluminium Joints)
Others like IIW recommendations, specific industry norms?
We aim to implement specific computational procedures from these standards (e.g., characteristic SN curves, mean stress effects, notch calculations), not the entire documents.
What calculation methods from which standards would be most valuable for FatPy?
Please suggest relevant norms and the specific methods within them.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
To make
FatPyuseful for practical engineering design, we should consider implementing calculation methods based on common fatigue design standards or guidelines.Which norms do you think are most important for
FatPyto incorporate methods from? Examples could include:We aim to implement specific computational procedures from these standards (e.g., characteristic SN curves, mean stress effects, notch calculations), not the entire documents.
What calculation methods from which standards would be most valuable for
FatPy?Please suggest relevant norms and the specific methods within them.
Thanks for your input!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions