This could be useful when combined with our existing flush logic
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2011/12/27/amazon-s3-announces-object-expiration/
For example imagine that we have a small node project with a below average amount of dependencies that results in a 1GB cache file 😈 . If the project is inactivate (or is deleted), builds are not running, and files might not get flushed. Expiration could be a useful fallback here.
This could be useful when combined with our existing flush logic
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2011/12/27/amazon-s3-announces-object-expiration/
For example imagine that we have a small node project with a below average amount of dependencies that results in a 1GB cache file 😈 . If the project is inactivate (or is deleted), builds are not running, and files might not get flushed. Expiration could be a useful fallback here.