You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: papers/2025-pldi-relational-abstractions-labeled-uf.md
+16-15Lines changed: 16 additions & 15 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -28,31 +28,32 @@ Our goal is to find **a new family of relational abstract domains that are cheap
28
28
For this, a central question is **can we compute the expensive transitive closure much more cheaply?** The answer is yes, if we assume that the relation obtained on each path between
29
29
two variables is always the same. This allows eliminating the vast majority of relations, **we only need to
30
30
store a spanning tree** and can still recover any arbitrary relation in amortized almost-constant time, using a variation
31
-
of the efficient [union-find](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure) data structure, that we call the **labeled union-find**.
31
+
of the efficient [union-find](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure) data structure, that we call the **labeled union-find**.
0 commit comments