@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ The accompanying [implementation] document breaks the recommendations down into
104104concrete actions that can be implemented by project contributors. Its focus is
105105on drilling down to specific, achievable work that can be completed in
106106constrained blocks of time. Ultimately, the implementation items are decomposed
107- into a series of [ issues] and entered as GitHub [ project-doc-website ] /issues.
107+ into a series of issues and entered on GitHub ` PROJECT-DOC-WEBSITE /issues` .
108108
109109### How to use this document
110110
@@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ Readers interested in the current state of the documentation and the reasoning
115115behind the recommendations should read the section of this document pertaining
116116to their area of concern:
117117
118- - [ Project documentation] ( ./?TODO=ADD-URL )
119- - [ Contributor documentation] ( ./?TODO=ADD-URL )
120- - [ Website and documentation infrastructure] ( ./?TODO=ADD-URL )
118+ - [ Project documentation] ( #project-documentation )
119+ - [ Contributor documentation] ( #contributor-documentation )
120+ - [ Website and documentation infrastructure] ( #website-and-infrastructure )
121121
122122Examples of CNCF documentation that demonstrate the analysis criteria are linked
123123from the [ criteria] specification.
@@ -550,8 +550,7 @@ The numeric rating values used in this document are as follows
550550[ criteria ] : ../criteria.md
551551[ implementation ] : ./implementation.md
552552[ issues list ] : ./issues-list.md
553- [ project-doc-website ] : ./?_PROJECT-DOC-URL_
554- [ project-website ] : ./?_PROJECT-WEBSITE_
553+ [ project-website ] : _PROJECT-WEBSITE_
555554[ Rating (1-5) ] : #rating-values
556555[ rfc-spec ] : https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119
557556[ website guidelines ] : ../../website-guidelines-checklist.md
0 commit comments