You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: .github/skills/issue-review.md
+41-22Lines changed: 41 additions & 22 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -69,9 +69,11 @@ Recommend **CLOSE** (state_reason: `completed`) if, based on references within t
69
69
When closing, cite the specific PR number and release version if known.
70
70
71
71
**Template:**
72
+
72
73
> This issue has been fixed in PR #XXXX, which was released in **wrangler X.Y.Z** (or the relevant package version). Please update and let us know if you're still seeing the issue.
73
74
74
75
Or for older issues where the fix can't be pinpointed:
76
+
75
77
> This is a fairly old issue, and from testing with the latest version, it appears to have been resolved. I'm going to close it for now — if you're still running into problems on the latest version, feel free to open a new issue with more details and we can investigate further.
76
78
77
79
#### 2d: Duplicate
@@ -81,9 +83,11 @@ Recommend **CLOSE** (state_reason: `not_planned`) if a comment or linked referen
81
83
When closing, link to the canonical issue.
82
84
83
85
**Template:**
86
+
84
87
> Closing as a duplicate of #XXXX. Please follow that issue for updates.
85
88
86
89
If the duplicate is in another repo:
90
+
87
91
> I'm closing this as a duplicate of <owner/repo>#XXXX, which is where this is being tracked.
> It looks like this issue is coming from <framework>, rather than from workers-sdk. I'd recommend opening an issue on that project's repo: <link>. If it turns out to be a workers-sdk issue after all, feel free to open a new issue here with more details.
102
107
103
108
For runtime issues:
109
+
104
110
> This looks like a Workers runtime issue rather than a tooling issue. The right place to track this is [cloudflare/workerd](https://github.com/cloudflare/workerd) so I've moved the issue there.
105
111
106
112
(Set Action field to: "Transfer to cloudflare/workerd, then post this comment.")
107
113
108
114
For account/support issues:
115
+
109
116
> Unfortunately, we're unable to provide support for account-level issues via GitHub. Please contact Cloudflare Support at https://dash.cloudflare.com/?to=/:account/support or the email address mentioned in the error message.
- A maintainer asked for a reproduction or clarification and the reporter never responded
118
125
119
126
**Template:**
127
+
120
128
> We haven't heard from you in a while so I'm going to close this issue for now. If you're still running into problems, feel free to open a new issue with more details and we can investigate further.
121
129
122
130
For very old issues:
131
+
123
132
> This is a very old issue so I'm going to close it for now. If you're still running into problems on the latest version, feel free to comment with more details and we can investigate further.
- The error is from Cloudflare's API (not from Wrangler itself) and there's no way to fix it in workers-sdk
132
141
133
142
**Template:**
143
+
134
144
> This was a transient API issue, and should be resolved now. If you're still seeing this error, please open a new issue with the latest details and we can investigate further.
135
145
136
146
Or for old transient issues:
147
+
137
148
> This appears to have been a transient server-side API issue. Similar reports were caused by Cloudflare API incidents that have since been resolved. I'm going to close this for now.
When closing, explain the correct approach and link to relevant documentation. Be helpful, not dismissive.
148
159
149
160
**Template:**
161
+
150
162
> This isn't a bug — <briefexplanationofthecorrectbehavior>. You can find more details in the docs: <link>. I'm going to close this for now, but feel free to ask on our [Discord](https://discord.cloudflare.com) if you have more questions.
151
163
152
164
#### 2i: Breaking Change
@@ -160,6 +172,7 @@ The issue should remain open as a tracking item. Do not close it — the team ha
160
172
**Suggested labels:**`breaking change`
161
173
162
174
**Template:**
175
+
163
176
> Changing this behavior at this stage would be a breaking change, so it will need to wait for the next major version. I've added the `breaking change` label to track this.
164
177
165
178
(Set Action field to: "Apply `breaking change` label, then post this comment.")
> This is intentional behavior — <briefexplanation>. I don't think we're likely to change this in the near future, but we appreciate the feedback.
179
193
180
194
For feature requests that won't happen:
195
+
181
196
> Thanks for the suggestion. We don't intend to implement this right now, but it may be revisited in future. <Optional: brief explanation of why, or pointer to an alternative approach.>
0 commit comments