|
| 1 | +\# Coverage |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This directory contains coverage-tracking artifacts used to measure, visualize, and prioritize detection engineering progress. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +\## Purpose |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +Coverage tracking helps the program understand: |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +\- which attacker behaviors are represented in current content |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +\- where meaningful detection gaps remain |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +\- which tactics or techniques need additional engineering focus |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +\- how detection engineering maturity is progressing over time |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +Coverage is intended to support both engineering decision-making and leadership reporting. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +\## Coverage Areas |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +\### MITRE ATT\&CK |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +\- \[MITRE Folder](mitre/) |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Used for: |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +\- ATT\&CK coverage matrices |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +\- coverage summaries |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +\- documented gaps |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +\- gap closure tracking |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +\### Cyber Kill Chain |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +\- \[Cyber Kill Chain Folder](cyber-kill-chain/) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +Used for: |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +\- CKC-aligned coverage views |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +\- supporting summaries |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +\- visual or matrix-based reporting where applicable |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +\## Typical Artifacts |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Examples of artifacts in this directory may include: |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +\- coverage matrix CSV files |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +\- coverage summary markdown files |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +\- gap tracking documents |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +\- supporting charts or exported visuals |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +\- tactic and technique mapping support files |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +\## How Coverage Should Be Used |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +Coverage artifacts should help answer questions such as: |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +\- which ATT\&CK tactics have the strongest current support? |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +\- which tactics or techniques are underrepresented? |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +\- which gaps are blocked by telemetry rather than engineering effort? |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +\- which areas should be prioritized in the roadmap? |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +\- how is coverage changing over time? |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +\## Coverage Principles |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +Coverage tracking should be: |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +\### Useful |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +It should support decision-making, not just exist as a count of mapped rules. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +\### Structured |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +Artifacts should be maintained in predictable folders and formats. |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +\### Honest |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +Coverage should not overstate maturity or depth simply because a tactic has one starter rule. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +\### Aligned |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +Coverage should connect back to roadmap priorities, telemetry reality, and program maturity. |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +\### Reportable |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +Artifacts should be usable in quarterly reviews, annual reviews, and executive updates. |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +\## Related Content |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +\- \[Detections](../detections/) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +\- \[Reporting](../docs/04\_reporting/) |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +\- \[Strategy](../docs/01\_strategy/) |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +\- \[Visuals](../docs/03\_visuals/) |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +\- \[Data Source Catalog](../governance/data-source-catalog.md) |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +\## Recommended Review Rhythm |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +Coverage artifacts should be reviewed: |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +\- periodically during content expansion |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +\- during quarterly reporting cycles |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +\- during annual roadmap review |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +\- whenever significant new detections are added |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +\- whenever major telemetry changes affect use case feasibility |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +\## Goal |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +The goal of this directory is to make detection coverage visible, actionable, and measurable so the program can mature deliberately rather than grow without direction. |
| 180 | + |
0 commit comments