diff --git a/.optimize-cache.json b/.optimize-cache.json
index 93ffcfb348..0ed1c34ddd 100644
--- a/.optimize-cache.json
+++ b/.optimize-cache.json
@@ -544,6 +544,7 @@
   "images/blog/hosting-flutter-web/cover.png": "298e3730bf2943ccf6761ccf6d7af1e83316ececa9cdf4f008592344478427b9",
   "images/blog/how-appwrite-makes-auth-easy-for-ecommerce/cover.png": "9f1a43d52b038e76d7d34e06429abf186eed3daa0fe8038a7ce8740b55f7e75f",
   "images/blog/how-can-you-rapidly-build-an-mvp-for-your-startup/cover-image.png": "745711bf15cb060d8d6ac0b7a3ae5a32203ad7ba87a6dd3f12a8d2517fd77d52",
+  "images/blog/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/cover.png": "6f50d7cbd1506e5a91b16eb6ed033c68942c266034abde4cbcad878ddc4c6566",
   "images/blog/how-to-attract-users-to-open-source-project/120k-users.png": "bb4be13cecf761a7d277ec253bc0447e4955afc0ee75760d0619afce891c5b85",
   "images/blog/how-to-attract-users-to-open-source-project/42k-stars.png": "807975e5404f4b731695d33df325be32797064fbbb4694dce5ccb07f95b2152b",
   "images/blog/how-to-attract-users-to-open-source-project/Colby-1.png": "feecbc7d0568e2a167c81073ac69fef7082f79eb05fa9599bb50b5450cb6fbae",
@@ -846,6 +847,7 @@
   "images/blog/scan-receipts-with-appwrite-functions/events.png": "e7901570861d7497c7b2088d4c655c5278ba4e52b914188c34e05ae0eea136fd",
   "images/blog/scan-receipts-with-appwrite-functions/scan-function.png": "1223d882682d8c34406526e5764968f0de32a5668bd6339cffd4bff0efb75485",
   "images/blog/screenshots-best-practices/cover.png": "85e3a467827c2f52541feaaafeac90e411252dad0ff3a0b9688e31e782836160",
+  "images/blog/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/cover.png": "9a819d76faf91a78fc6116b4202f08290d24a6002bcdd737dca2f85bd2546793",
   "images/blog/self-hosting-appwrite-with-coolify/add-appwrite.png": "b1efadc68d075357c32698569856f7cb106ddce6caf3b88e50698a1ef97e283a",
   "images/blog/self-hosting-appwrite-with-coolify/add-ssh-key-to-digitalocean.png": "0eb128b8cdfde988da008385254e1c49621e4b98072f3959267a32b5765df827",
   "images/blog/self-hosting-appwrite-with-coolify/add-ssh-key.png": "8bdb1b8751fbdc89cb9f5b07af9c4a8c4bc825c7035899e9fc5f2ba1ac7700c2",
@@ -959,6 +961,7 @@
   "images/blog/the-evolution-of-team-appwrite/cs-dojo-tweets.png": "20ea717bd8edf77fd839dbd3aa843da421487d7eb6e255dddddfa6016c7556ea",
   "images/blog/the-evolution-of-team-appwrite/eddie-jaoude.png": "333d49c3cd39d42e3b11c13bbce329b6a4e80664d4489fa497f3a563a3abd793",
   "images/blog/the-evolution-of-team-appwrite/hiring-cover.png": "c9a76fd149e9d6b7733cc0f23d406071f45c9336c4c60cf4abc94bcf2aeb0070",
+  "images/blog/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/cover.png": "520c900fbf50be39555514f30ab6e5d467f22fa6c0b45ae0681ed83704d3ddaf",
   "images/blog/the-future-of-coding-cursor-ai-and-the-rise-of-backend-automation-with-appwrite/cursorappwrite_cover.png": "33061608299b5fb82dce8db7215ba78dec2a4ec78153c7cec4c8d8da19d833a9",
   "images/blog/the-journey-and-meaning-behind-our-new-logo/break.png": "a0da422099faff15de9f3995f6bc3ac9513784f1848918e14be698b86f951c60",
   "images/blog/the-journey-and-meaning-behind-our-new-logo/cover.png": "374782c41e19e07f65ed89f069d398a0eabedcb79251debd28629a8ca03d8eb9",
diff --git a/src/routes/blog/post/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/+page.markdoc b/src/routes/blog/post/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/+page.markdoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1081902533
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/routes/blog/post/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/+page.markdoc
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: How developer tools are evolving in 2026
+description: "The developer tools landscape is shifting toward cohesive, integrated backends. See what's changing in 2026 and how Appwrite is built for exactly this moment."
+date: 2026-03-19
+cover: /images/blog/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/cover.png
+timeToRead: 5
+author: aishwari
+category: product
+featured: false
+unlisted: true
+---
+
+The developer tools ecosystem has never been more crowded. Every week, a new framework launches. A new abstraction promises to simplify infrastructure. A new platform claims to eliminate complexity. And yet, many teams still find themselves spending more time configuring systems than shipping products.
+
+The shift happening in 2026 isn't about adding more layers to the stack. It's architectural: developers are moving away from assembling collections of specialized tools and toward cohesive systems with strong defaults. Here's what that evolution looks like, and why it matters for how you build.
+
+# From developer tool sprawl to integrated systems
+
+Over the past decade, building a production application typically meant stitching together a collection of specialized services: authentication from one provider, a database from another, object storage elsewhere, serverless functions hosted separately, realtime handled through yet another integration.
+
+Individually, these developer tools were often excellent. Collectively, they introduced compounding complexity. Every integration created new surface area for bugs, permission mismatches, and maintenance overhead that nobody planned for.
+
+In 2026, teams are asking a different question. Not "what is the best auth provider?" but "what backend foundation lets us ship consistently without integration fatigue?" The developer tools winning right now aren't necessarily the ones with the most features. They're the ones that provide coherent primitives that work well together.
+
+# Backend complexity is becoming invisible
+
+Frontend developer tools have improved dramatically in ergonomics over the years. Backend development has traditionally lagged behind, requiring deep infrastructure knowledge even for common use cases that have been solved dozens of times before. That expectation is changing.
+
+Developers now treat certain capabilities as built-in assumptions rather than things they need to implement:
+
+- Role-based access control
+- Relationship-aware databases
+- Secure file storage with per-resource permissions
+- Server-side filtering
+- Structured realtime subscriptions
+
+These are no longer considered advanced features of developer tools. They're expected primitives. In 2026, developers want to stand up a production-ready backend in minutes, not spend weeks debating architecture decisions that have been solved before.
+
+# Realtime is the default, not an upgrade
+
+Realtime functionality used to be treated as an enhancement, something you added after the core product was working. Today, it's a baseline expectation.
+
+Modern applications demand live dashboards, collaborative interfaces, instant log streams, and responsive experiences that feel immediate. Implementing realtime manually through custom WebSocket layers feels increasingly unnecessary when developer tools are evolving to treat it as a first-class capability rather than an integration project.
+
+Structured, server-side filtered subscriptions are becoming standard components of backend developer tools. The expectation is simple: realtime should work without excessive configuration.
+
+# Type safety and SDK automation are now baseline
+
+The cost of runtime errors is high. As applications grow, so does the need for predictability across the stack.
+
+In 2026, developers expect developer tools to provide:
+
+- Auto-generated SDKs aligned with backend schemas
+- Strong typing that reflects what's actually defined in the backend
+- Project-aware API generation
+- Clear, predictable contracts between client and server
+
+Manual SDK maintenance and mismatched schemas feel like a previous era. Modern developer tools integrate deeply into the development lifecycle, ensuring that what's defined in the backend is reflected accurately in the client without extra effort. Automation is no longer a luxury, it's infrastructure hygiene.
+
+# Optionality is a core requirement, not a differentiator
+
+Cloud-native development has become the default. But flexibility remains critical, and teams are increasingly unwilling to trade one for the other.
+
+Developers and organizations want developer tools that support:
+
+- Managed cloud environments when speed is the priority
+- Self-hosted deployments when compliance or data residency requires it
+- Open standards instead of opaque lock-in that makes migration expensive later
+
+Container-first architectures have made this flexibility practical. In 2026, it's not unusual for teams to move between local development, self-hosted production, and managed cloud environments, and expect their developer tools to follow them without friction.
+
+The most trusted platforms are those that respect this optionality rather than penalizing teams for wanting it.
+
+# Developer experience is the product
+
+Perhaps the most important shift is philosophical.
+
+Developer experience is no longer a secondary consideration layered on top of capability. It is the product. Clear documentation, predictable APIs, thoughtful CLI tooling, and clean dashboards influence adoption as much as performance benchmarks. Developers are quick to switch when friction accumulates, and in a market where alternatives are abundant, the cost of poor DX is immediate.
+
+The developer tools that succeed in 2026 feel cohesive, intentional, and consistent across the entire workflow. Not just in the happy path, but when something goes wrong, when you're debugging at 11pm, and when a new developer joins the team and needs to get productive fast.
+
+# The end of glue code
+
+For years, much of backend engineering involved writing and maintaining glue code: connecting services, normalizing responses, synchronizing permissions, maintaining integration logic between developer tools that were never designed to work together.
+
+That appetite has diminished. Modern backend developer tools are consolidating essential primitives, authentication, databases, storage, functions, permissions, and realtime, into unified foundations. Not to remove flexibility, but to eliminate the redundant effort that comes with assembling them from scratch on every project.
+
+Developers want to focus on business logic, user experience, and iteration speed. The best developer tools in 2026 enable that focus instead of competing with it.
+
+# What this means for how you build
+
+The direction of developer tooling in 2026 is clear: fewer moving parts, stronger defaults, cohesive primitives, and infrastructure that stays out of the way.
+
+If you're evaluating backend architecture today, it's worth asking whether your current stack is accelerating development or quietly taxing it. The most meaningful evolution in developer tools isn't technical complexity, it's simplicity done well.
+
+And in 2026, simplicity is a competitive advantage.
+
+# Where Appwrite fits in
+
+Every trend covered here points in the same direction: less assembly, more coherence. That's the foundation Appwrite was built on.
+
+Appwrite is an open-source backend platform that brings authentication, databases, file storage, serverless functions, realtime subscriptions, messaging, and frontend hosting with Appwrite Sites into a single, unified foundation. Not services that happen to share a dashboard, primitives that were designed to work together from day one.
+
+- **One permission model across everything.** Auth rules, database access, storage permissions, and function triggers all share the same system. No synchronization logic, no mismatched SDKs, no gaps where things quietly break.
+
+- **Realtime as a first-class primitive.** Structured, server-side filtered subscriptions are built in, not a third-party integration bolted on after the fact. Live dashboards and collaborative features work the way developers now expect them to.
+
+- **Type safety without the maintenance.** Auto-generated SDKs stay in sync with your backend schema automatically. What's defined in the backend is what the client sees, no drift, no surprises as the product evolves.
+
+- **Ship anywhere, without trade-offs.** Appwrite is fully open-source and container-native. Run it locally during development, self-host it for compliance or data residency, or use Appwrite Cloud when you'd rather skip the infrastructure entirely. The platform follows your team's needs, not the other way around.
+
+The glue code never gets written because the parts were never disconnected to begin with. Less time configuring infrastructure. More time building the product.
+
+# Resources
+
+- [Sign up for Appwrite Cloud](https://cloud.appwrite.io/)
+- [Appwrite Docs](/docs)
+- [Join our Discord Community](/discord)
diff --git a/src/routes/blog/post/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/+page.markdoc b/src/routes/blog/post/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/+page.markdoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a95b8abf9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/routes/blog/post/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/+page.markdoc
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Self-hosted vs managed backends: a practical comparison"
+description: Compare self-hosted and managed backends to understand tradeoffs in control, cost, and speed, and choose the right approach with Appwrite.
+date: 2026-03-19
+cover: /images/blog/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/cover.png
+timeToRead: 5
+author: aishwari
+category: product
+featured: false
+unlisted: true
+---
+
+Choosing a backend strategy is no longer just a technical decision. It affects velocity, reliability, security posture, hiring needs, and long-term cost. And one question comes up more than most:
+
+**Should we self-host our backend, or use a managed service?**
+
+There's no universal answer. The right choice depends on your stage, your team, and the level of control you genuinely need. Here's how to think through it.
+
+# What self-hosting actually means
+
+Self-hosting means your team is responsible for running and maintaining your backend infrastructure. That includes:
+
+- Provisioning servers or containers
+- Managing databases and storage
+- Configuring scaling rules
+- Monitoring uptime and responding to incidents
+- Applying security patches
+- Handling backups and disaster recovery
+
+Whether you're running on cloud virtual machines, dedicated hardware, or containerized infrastructure, the operational surface area belongs to your team. Every hour spent on infrastructure maintenance is an hour not spent shipping product, that's the core tradeoff.
+
+## When self-hosting makes sense
+
+Self-hosting is often the right call when:
+
+- You need strict data residency or regulatory compliance
+- You operate in regulated industries where data leaving your environment isn't an option
+- You require deep infrastructure customization
+- You have an experienced DevOps team with the capacity to manage it
+- Avoiding vendor lock-in is a hard requirement
+
+If your organization already has mature infrastructure processes, self-hosting may feel natural. But it's worth being honest about the ongoing maintenance commitment before committing to it.
+
+# What a managed backend actually covers
+
+A managed backend handles infrastructure on your behalf. You don't worry about server provisioning, scaling configuration, patching, availability, or failover. You focus on building features.
+
+## When managed makes sense
+
+Managed backends are often the better fit when:
+
+- You need to ship quickly and can't afford weeks of setup
+- You don't have a dedicated DevOps team
+- Your team is small or primarily product-focused
+- You want predictable infrastructure costs
+- Velocity matters more than infrastructure ownership right now
+
+For startups and lean teams, choosing managed can save weeks of setup and ongoing maintenance overhead, time that goes directly into product development instead.
+
+# The real comparison: Control vs velocity
+
+The difference between self-hosting and managed isn't just technical. It's strategic.
+
+| Area | Self-Hosted | Managed |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Control | Full control over infrastructure | Limited to platform capabilities |
+| Maintenance | Your responsibility | Platform handles it |
+| Scaling | Manual or custom | Built-in |
+| Security patching | You manage it | Handled automatically |
+| Time to launch | Slower | Faster |
+| Operational risk | Higher | Lower |
+
+The question underneath all of this is: **Do you want to manage infrastructure, or build product?**
+
+Neither answer is wrong. But teams sometimes choose self-hosting for perceived cost savings without accounting for the real cost, engineering time on infrastructure, on-call rotations, incident management, and security updates. Even when cloud compute looks cheaper on paper, internal engineering time rarely is.
+
+# The hidden costs teams often underestimate
+
+Managed platforms may appear more expensive upfront, but total cost of ownership often tells a different story when you factor in:
+
+- Engineering hours spent on infrastructure setup and maintenance
+- On-call coverage and incident response
+- Monitoring and observability tooling
+- Security audits and patch cycles
+- Scaling failures and the debugging time that follows
+
+Underestimating these costs is one of the most common reasons teams end up regretting an early decision to self-host before they were ready for it.
+
+# Why most teams end up wanting both
+
+Here's what's changed in recent years: developers no longer want to choose between flexibility and simplicity.
+
+The pattern that's emerged is teams that want open-source transparency, the ability to self-host when necessary, and a managed option when speed is the priority, all on consistent APIs so the choice doesn't lock them into a migration later.
+
+Starting managed and moving to self-hosted when compliance or infrastructure control becomes a genuine requirement is a legitimate path. So is staying managed indefinitely and putting all engineering capacity toward product. The problem is choosing a platform that forces the decision too early.
+
+# Where Appwrite fits
+
+Appwrite was designed with this flexibility in mind. You can self-host Appwrite on any Docker-compatible infrastructure and run it entirely within your own environment. Or you can use Appwrite Cloud as a fully managed backend with no infrastructure management required.
+
+The APIs are identical across both. That means:
+
+- No lock-in to a proprietary system
+- No forced migration if your requirements change
+- Move between cloud and self-hosted anytime
+- No rewriting your application if you move from managed to self-hosted or the other way around
+
+You can start on Appwrite Cloud to ship quickly, and migrate to a self-hosted deployment later if compliance or control becomes critical. Or stay managed and focus entirely on product. Appwrite gives you the choice without penalizing you for making it.
+
+# A practical framework for deciding today
+
+**Choose managed if:**
+
+- You're early-stage and need to ship fast
+- Your team is product-focused without dedicated DevOps capacity
+- You want infrastructure handled without ongoing maintenance overhead
+
+**Choose self-hosted if:**
+
+- You have strict compliance or data residency requirements
+- You have DevOps resources and the capacity to manage infrastructure
+- You need deep infrastructure customization that a managed platform can't support
+
+And if you're unsure: choose a platform that supports both. Flexibility today prevents migration pain tomorrow.
+
+# Backend strategy is about alignment, not ideology
+
+Self-hosting offers control. Managed services offer velocity. The best platforms don't force you into one path; they let you decide based on what your team and product actually need, and let you change your mind later without paying for it.
+
+Appwrite is open source, supports full self-hosting, and is available as a fully managed service on Appwrite Cloud. Start where it makes sense for your team today.
+
+# Resources
+
+- [Sign up for Appwrite Cloud](https://cloud.appwrite.io/)
+- [Appwrite Docs](/docs)
+- [Self-hosting Appwrite](/docs/advanced/self-hosting)
+- [Join our Discord Community](/discord)
diff --git a/src/routes/blog/post/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/+page.markdoc b/src/routes/blog/post/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/+page.markdoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..9fec00bf34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/routes/blog/post/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/+page.markdoc
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: The fastest way to launch your next side project
+description: Ship your side project faster by skipping backend setup. Build your MVP in days with authentication, databases, and APIs ready out of the box.
+date: 2026-03-19
+cover: /images/blog/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/cover.png
+timeToRead: 5
+author: aishwari
+category: startup
+featured: false
+---
+
+Every developer has at least one idea sitting in the back of their mind. A tool to solve a small daily annoyance. A weekend SaaS experiment. Something you've been meaning to build "when things calm down." You tell yourself you'll start it soon, next weekend, maybe, or once the current project wraps up.
+
+And somehow, that idea never leaves the notes app. The problem usually isn't the idea. It's the friction that comes before you can build anything meaningful. Before you touch the feature you actually care about, you're setting up authentication, configuring a database, writing API endpoints, handling file uploads, and figuring out deployment. By the time the foundation is ready, the momentum that sparked the idea is already gone.
+
+This is about eliminating that friction, so your next side project actually ships.
+
+# Why most side projects never launch
+
+Side projects rarely fail because of bad ideas. They fail because of lost momentum.
+
+A typical week looks like this: idea on Monday, new repository on Tuesday, auth setup on Wednesday, database configuration on Thursday, API wiring on Friday. By the weekend, you've written hundreds of lines of code and still have nothing a user can touch. No real feature. No real product. Just infrastructure.
+
+At that point it starts to feel less like a fun side project and more like unpaid overtime. So you pause it. And once a side project is paused, it rarely comes back.
+
+Speed matters, not because you're in a race, but because **momentum is the only thing keeping a side project alive.** The longer the gap between your initial idea and something working, the harder it is to stay motivated.
+
+# Define your MVP before you write a single line of code
+
+When you start a side project, you don't need a full product. You need a working proof of value.
+
+That means one core feature, one clear user, one problem solved. Not a dashboard with ten tabs, not analytics and billing and notifications and AI features. Just one simple flow that proves the idea works.
+
+If your idea is a habit tracker, your MVP might be:
+
+- Sign up
+- Add a habit
+- Mark it complete
+
+That's enough to launch. Everything else can come later.
+
+The mistake most developers make at this stage is scope creep before a single user has seen the product, adding "just one more feature" before launch until a three-day project becomes a three-month project. The MVP mindset protects against that. The faster you get to something working, the faster you start learning from real users. And learning from real users is the only feedback loop that actually matters.
+
+# The setup problem and how to skip it
+
+Most of the time spent on a side project isn't spent building the idea. It's spent building everything around it.
+
+At a minimum, a typical side project requires:
+
+- **Authentication:** Sign-up, login, sessions, password resets, OAuth providers
+- **A database:** Schema design, queries, indexes, relationships
+- **File storage:** Upload handling, access control, file type restrictions
+- **API endpoints:** Writing, testing, and securing them
+- **Permissions:** Defining who can access what and enforcing it consistently
+- **Deployment:** Environment configuration, hosting, CI/CD
+
+None of this makes your product unique. It's table stakes. And it can consume a full week of evenings before you've built a single feature specific to your idea.
+
+This is the problem Appwrite is built to solve. Appwrite is an open-source developer platform that gives you the backend pieces most side projects need out of the box: authentication, databases, storage, functions, real-time, and messaging. Everything works together without extra integration work. Instead of spending days on infrastructure, you can have a working backend in minutes and move straight to the part that makes your side project worth building.
+
+# What a fast side project launch actually looks like
+
+Launching quickly doesn't mean cutting corners. It means being deliberate about what you build and in what order.
+
+A realistic fast-launch timeline using Appwrite:
+
+## Day 1: Foundation
+Define the problem and the MVP scope. Set up your Appwrite project, configure authentication, and create your database collections. At the end of day one, users can sign up and your data layer is ready.
+
+## Day 2: Core feature
+Build the one feature that proves your idea has value. With authentication and database already handled, your entire focus goes into product logic, the thing only you are building.
+
+## Day 3: Interface and launch
+Add a simple, functional UI. Deploy your frontend with Appwrite Sites or your preferred hosting. Share it with a small group of real users.
+
+At the end of three days, you have something real. Not a prototype. Not a concept. A live product that users can interact with and give you feedback on.
+
+# Don't treat your side project like a startup from day one
+
+One of the most common mistakes developers make is treating a side project like a full-scale production system before a single user has signed up, worrying about scaling to millions of users, perfect backend architecture, and a complete feature set before anything exists.
+
+This is the problem Appwrite is built to solve. Appwrite is an open-source developer platform that gives you the pieces most side projects need out of the box: authentication, databases, storage, functions, real-time, messaging, and web hosting with Appwrite Sites. Everything works together without extra integration work. Instead of spending days wiring up infrastructure and deployment, you can have a working foundation in minutes and move straight to the part that makes your side project worth building.
+
+Your first version should feel small. Maybe even a little rough. Its job isn't to impress, its job is to exist. Once it exists, you can iterate based on what real users actually need rather than what you assumed they'd need. A useful question to ask at every decision point: *does this need to exist in version one?* If the answer is no, it doesn't get built yet.
+
+# Launch before it feels ready
+
+If your side project feels polished and complete before launch, you probably waited too long.
+
+The right time to launch is when the core feature works and someone can meaningfully use it, even if the UI is rough, even if features are missing. Shipping at this point means you're learning from real users instead of guessing what they want. User feedback will reshape your roadmap in ways you can't predict from the inside.
+
+The fastest way to improve a side project isn't more planning. It's shipping, listening, and iterating. None of that loop starts until you launch.
+
+# Stop configuring. Start building.
+
+Side projects are your space to experiment, build, and create something entirely yours. But when the first few days disappear into infrastructure setup instead of feature development, that motivation fades fast.
+
+Appwrite exists so you don’t have to make that trade-off. It gives you production-ready essentials out of the box, all in one place. Set up your backend in minutes and focus on what actually matters: building.
+
+Your next side project doesn't need six months of planning. It needs a clear idea, a focused weekend, and a backend that gets out of your way.
+
+# Resources
+
+- [Sign up for Appwrite Cloud](https://cloud.appwrite.io/)
+- [Appwrite Docs](/docs)
+- [Join our Discord Community](/discord)
diff --git a/static/images/blog/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/cover.png b/static/images/blog/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/cover.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..036008a87a
Binary files /dev/null and b/static/images/blog/how-developer-tools-are-evolving-in-2026/cover.png differ
diff --git a/static/images/blog/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/cover.png b/static/images/blog/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/cover.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..81ee96b617
Binary files /dev/null and b/static/images/blog/self-hosted-vs-managed-backends-a-practical-comparison/cover.png differ
diff --git a/static/images/blog/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/cover.png b/static/images/blog/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/cover.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..84c714b171
Binary files /dev/null and b/static/images/blog/the-fastest-way-to-launch-your-next-side-project/cover.png differ