Search before asking
Paimon version
When doing a lookup join to the remote query service (for primary key tables), we pass the partition keys, a bucket number, and a row to join to the existing table. Right now, serialization of the row fails because the serializer expected by the remote query service client assumes that the row includes partition fields, but we do not pass them (this is the same in LocalTableQuery, not a bug).
Let's change the key serializer here to avoid looking for partition keys.
Compute Engine
Flink
Minimal reproduce step
Use the remote query service to perform a lookup join from a flink row to a paimon table. The table must be partitioned, and the partitioned key and trimmed key must have different types (e.g. int vs. string). I'll include a test case in the PR that trips it up.
What doesn't meet your expectations?
java.lang.ClassCastException: class org.apache.paimon.data.BinaryString cannot be cast to class java.lang.Integer
at org.apache.paimon.data.GenericRow.getInt(GenericRow.java:152)
at org.apache.paimon.data.serializer.InternalRowSerializer.toBinaryRow(InternalRowSerializer.java:123)
at org.apache.paimon.flink.query.RemoteTableQuery.lookup(RemoteTableQuery.java:73)
Anything else?
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
Search before asking
Paimon version
When doing a lookup join to the remote query service (for primary key tables), we pass the partition keys, a bucket number, and a row to join to the existing table. Right now, serialization of the row fails because the serializer expected by the remote query service client assumes that the row includes partition fields, but we do not pass them (this is the same in LocalTableQuery, not a bug).
Let's change the key serializer here to avoid looking for partition keys.
Compute Engine
Flink
Minimal reproduce step
Use the remote query service to perform a lookup join from a flink row to a paimon table. The table must be partitioned, and the partitioned key and trimmed key must have different types (e.g. int vs. string). I'll include a test case in the PR that trips it up.
What doesn't meet your expectations?
Anything else?
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?