[java] java.lang.LinkageError: bad method type alias: (TypeResolver,Class,TypeDef)void not visible from class

[eryanwcp]

Search before asking

• I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Version

Fory(java) 1.2.0、1.3.0

Component(s)

Java

Minimal reproduce step

Tomcat 9.0.118 redeploy war

Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessException: no such constructor: com.eryansky.fastweixin.cluster.AccessTokenCacheForyRefCodecCompatible0_0.(TypeResolver,Class,TypeDef)void/invokeSpecial
at java.lang.invoke.MemberName.makeAccessException(MemberName.java:867)
at java.lang.invoke.MemberName$Factory.resolveOrFail(MemberName.java:1003)
at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup.resolveOrFail(MethodHandles.java:1386)
at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup.findConstructor(MethodHandles.java:924)
at org.apache.fory.reflect.ReflectionUtils.lambda$getCtrHandle$1(ReflectionUtils.java:162)
at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(ConcurrentHashMap.java:1660)
at org.apache.fory.reflect.ReflectionUtils.getCtrHandle(ReflectionUtils.java:158)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.newGeneratedCompatibleSerializer(TypeResolver.java:1244)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.getMetaSharedTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:1231)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.createMetaSharedTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:1079)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.buildMetaSharedTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:1064)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.buildCheckedMetaSharedTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:1090)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.readSharedTypeDefInfo(TypeResolver.java:903)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.readSharedClassTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:882)
at org.apache.fory.resolver.TypeResolver.readTypeInfo(TypeResolver.java:633)
at org.apache.fory.context.ReadContext.readRef(ReadContext.java:532)
at org.apache.fory.Fory.deserialize(Fory.java:515)
... 104 more
Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: bad method type alias: (TypeResolver,Class,TypeDef)void not visible from class com.eryansky.fastweixin.cluster.AccessTokenCacheForyRefCodecCompatible0_0
at java.lang.invoke.MemberName.checkForTypeAlias(MemberName.java:793)
at java.lang.invoke.MemberName$Factory.resolve(MemberName.java:976)
at java.lang.invoke.MemberName$Factory.resolveOrFail(MemberName.java:1000)

public class ForySerializer implements Serializer {

private final static Logger log = org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(ForySerializer.class);

private static volatile ThreadSafeFory fory = null;
private static final AllowListChecker typeChecker;

static {
    LoggerFactory.useSlf4jLogging(true);
    // AllowListChecker checker = new AllowListChecker(AllowListChecker.CheckLevel.STRICT);
    AllowListChecker checker = new AllowListChecker(AllowListChecker.CheckLevel.WARN);

    log.info("Using default TypeChecker: {} checkLevel: {}", checker.getClass().getName(), checker.getCheckLevel().name());
    typeChecker = checker;

    fory = Fory.builder().withLanguage(Language.JAVA)
            // Allow to deserialize objects unknown types, more flexible
            // but may be insecure if the classes contains malicious code.
            .withRefTracking(true)
            .requireClassRegistration(false)
            .withTypeChecker(typeChecker)
            .buildThreadSafeFory();
}

public ForySerializer(){

}

@Override
public String name() {
    return "fory";
}

@Override
public byte[] serialize(Object obj) throws IOException {
    return fory.serialize(obj);
}

@Override
public Object deserialize(byte[] bytes) throws IOException {
    return fory.deserialize(bytes);
}

public static ThreadSafeFory getFory() {
    return fory;
}

public static AllowListChecker getTypeChecker() {
    return typeChecker;
}
}

What did you expect to see?

Fory(java) 1.1.0 Tomcat 9.0.118 redeploy OK

What did you see instead?

Fory(java) Tomcat 9.0.118 redeploy OK

Anything Else?

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

• I'm willing to submit a PR!

[chaokunyang]

Could you provide a reproduction code? I can't reproduce your error. It seems there are still stale old Fory class cache in your cases.

[eryanwcp]

#3706

[chaokunyang]

I don't understand how this issue relates to #3706