test:all together with gcov:all ?

[turecekpetr]

Is the ceedling gcov:all utils:gcov sufficient, or do I need to run ceedling test:all gcov:all utils:gcov?
I believe that the test:all part can be omitted, as you still get the number of successful and failed tests.
But our project uses it "just to be sure" and I didn't found any official source to support my view.

[mvandervoord]

I'm assuming you're still using a 0.x release instead of a 1.x release, based on this question.

For 0.x, then ceedling gcov:all utils:gcov is sufficient. Doing the test:all will build all your tests and run them. The gcov:all will REBUILD all your tests with coverage included and run them, and then the utils:gcov will run the report generators on the generated output.

For 1.x, you only need ceedling gcov:all. The separation of test:all and gcov:all is still consistent, but the utils:gcov is no longer an option and is automatic. (meaning that running gcov:all will always automatically regenerate your reports.