Is X a bridge to a legit knowledge economy ... with an OPEN, competitve exchange akin to [and beyond] advanced capital markets?
WHAT might a 10,000 GPU grid be capable of ... only a START of a knowledge economy exchange or trading platform, to transcend fin markets?
Does @ElonMusk actually understand the bigger 1000-yr picture or WHY entreprenuerial cutomers are the secret sauce as the AGENTS that bring in the knowledge economy?
Does he get WHY these principal AGENTS will PAY for service, to a much greater extent than just blue checkmarks?
Or is Musk just another cartoon or parody of clueless tech imbecile billionaire who sees users [and THEIR data] as the product? Is he just another centralizer or autocratic power grabber?
Maybe the GPU buy ... https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-twitter-investment-generative-ai-project-2023-4 ....is just another sort of a commodity hoard, ie like tech staffing was until recently?
Maybe it's actually evidence of a decent clue of what the @twitter protocol could be?
What does it take for the techster CEOs to GET that social media customers [who have small businesses or ideas for ventures] will spend hundreds or thousands of dollars each month to get better, more active, configurable, extensible business-intelligence-as-a-servicefrom a LEADER?
Do any tech leaders GET what a KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY might look like?
And ... by the way ... why aren't manufacturers of GPUs renting their GPUs out by the hour with some sort of bidding/auction/accelerated negotiation mechanisms such as the @VAST_ai peer GPU rental platform?
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-twitter-investment-generative-ai-project-2023-4
Is X a bridge to a legit knowledge economy ... with an OPEN, competitve exchange akin to [and beyond] advanced capital markets?
WHAT might a 10,000 GPU grid be capable of ... only a START of a knowledge economy exchange or trading platform, to transcend fin markets?
Does @ElonMusk actually understand the bigger 1000-yr picture or WHY entreprenuerial cutomers are the secret sauce as the AGENTS that bring in the knowledge economy?
Does he get WHY these principal AGENTS will PAY for service, to a much greater extent than just blue checkmarks?
Or is Musk just another cartoon or parody of clueless tech imbecile billionaire who sees users [and THEIR data] as the product? Is he just another centralizer or autocratic power grabber?
Maybe the GPU buy ... https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-twitter-investment-generative-ai-project-2023-4 ....is just another sort of a commodity hoard, ie like tech staffing was until recently?
Maybe it's actually evidence of a decent clue of what the @twitter protocol could be?
What does it take for the techster CEOs to GET that social media customers [who have small businesses or ideas for ventures] will spend hundreds or thousands of dollars each month to get better, more active, configurable, extensible business-intelligence-as-a-servicefrom a LEADER?
Do any tech leaders GET what a KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY might look like?
And ... by the way ... why aren't manufacturers of GPUs renting their GPUs out by the hour with some sort of bidding/auction/accelerated negotiation mechanisms such as the @VAST_ai peer GPU rental platform?
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-twitter-investment-generative-ai-project-2023-4