STI resourcify .roles method issue

[RadoslawT]

Hello

I'm using Rolify 3.3.0.rc5 gem, and I have a problem with STI resourcify models, in my case Department < Group.

When I'm adding role for a Department Rolify adds it with resource Department. When I want to find all roles for the Department it looks for Group resource, so it returns nothing.

I've tried many combinations but nothing didn't work for me yet. Could you please give me any advices?

Console logs:

> User.last.add_role :test_role, Group.last
=> <Role id: 20, name: "test_role", resource_id: 35, resource_type: "Department", created_at: "2013-12-04 18:50:18", updated_at: "2013-12-04 18:50:18"> 

> Department.last.roles.size
  Department Load (1.0ms)  SELECT "groups".* FROM "groups" WHERE "groups"."type" IN ('Department') ORDER BY "groups"."id" DESC LIMIT 1
   (0.6ms)  SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "roles" WHERE "roles"."resource_id" = $1 AND "roles"."resource_type" = $2  [["resource_id", 35], ["resource_type", "Group"]]
 => 0 

> Group.last.roles.size
  Group Load (3.5ms)  SELECT "groups".* FROM "groups" ORDER BY "groups"."id" DESC LIMIT 1
   (0.7ms)  SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "roles" WHERE "roles"."resource_id" = $1 AND "roles"."resource_type" = $2  [["resource_id", 35], ["resource_type", "Group"]]
 => 0 

[RadoslawT]

I think this issue affects also destroying role, after destroying resource. When gem adds a role it uses child's class name as a resource type. When this resource is destroyed it looks for resource with main class name resource type, to destroy the role, so the role is not destroyed (Rolify 3.4.0).

TierGroup < Group

> User.first.add_role :group_leader, TierGroup.last

Role Load (13.9ms)  SELECT "roles".* FROM "roles" WHERE "roles"."name" = 'group_leader' AND "roles"."resource_type" = 'TierGroup' AND "roles"."resource_id" = 843745673 ORDER BY "roles"."id" ASC LIMIT 1

> TierGroup.last.destroy

  Role Load (0.8ms)  SELECT "roles".* FROM "roles" WHERE "roles"."resource_id" = $1 AND "roles"."resource_type" = $2  [["resource_id", 843745673], ["resource_type", "Group"]]

[doits]

#517 might fix this. You can give it a shot if you are still interested in this issue and see if it helps.