diff --git a/docs/release_notes.rst b/docs/release_notes.rst
index 278b69b3..16e10ca2 100644
--- a/docs/release_notes.rst
+++ b/docs/release_notes.rst
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Upcoming Release
 ..   The features listed below are not released yet, but will be part of the next release! 
 ..   To use the features already you have to use the ``master`` branch.
 
+* Update technology data for carbon dioxide compression step to dense phase for transport in large pipelines. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/273)
+
 * Add missing discount rate for OCGT in US-specific data. (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/269)
 
 `v0.14.0 <https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/releases/tag/v0.14.0>`__ (13th February 2026)
diff --git a/inputs/manual_input.csv b/inputs/manual_input.csv
index c49112ee..ed2e7bed 100644
--- a/inputs/manual_input.csv
+++ b/inputs/manual_input.csv
@@ -192,12 +192,11 @@ NH3 (l) storage tank incl. liquefaction,lifetime,2020,20,years,2010,"Morgan E. 2
 CO2 storage tank,investment,2050,2430,EUR/t_CO2,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, Table 3.","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
 CO2 storage tank,FOM,2050,1,%/year,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
 CO2 storage tank,lifetime,2050,25,years,2013,"Lauri et al. 2014: doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.297, pg. 2746 .","Assuming a 3000m^3 pressurised steel cylinder tanks and a CO2 density of 1100 kg/m^3 (close to triple point at -56.6°C and 5.2 bar with max density of 1200kg/m^3 ). Lauri et al. report costs 3x higher per m^3 for steel tanks, which are consistent with other sources. The numbers reported are in rather difficult to pinpoint as systems can greatly vary."
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,2004,12.8928283642224,EUR/t_CO2/h,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction."
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2004,5,%/year,2004,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2004,25,years,2004,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process."
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,2024,33288,EUR/t_CO2/h,2024,"Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf",
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,2024,5,%/year,2024,"Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf",
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,2024,25,years,2024,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,-,"Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf",
 General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),investment,2012,160,EUR/m^3,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 8F .",Assumed at the higher end for addon facilities/mid-range for stand-alone facilities. Product storage usually smaller due to higher requirements on safety and different construction method. Reference size used here: 40 000 - 60 000 m^3 .
 General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),FOM,2012,6.25,%/year,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , figure 7 and pg. 12 .",Assuming ca. 10 EUR/m^3/a (center value between stand alone and addon facility).
 General liquid hydrocarbon storage (product),lifetime,2012,30,years,2012,"Stelter and Nishida 2013: https://webstore.iea.org/insights-series-2013-focus-on-energy-security , pg. 11.",
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv
index 962739c9..958c0db4 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2020.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv
index 1323c389..efde52e2 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2025.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv
index 7a853548..d1de148e 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2030.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv
index ffecc32b..955d4621 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2035.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv
index 79ee49bc..c6f2914c 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2040.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv
index 23d4ac38..21277fc5 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2045.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv
index c5d89281..2aa0b0bc 100644
--- a/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv
+++ b/outputs/US/costs_2050.csv
@@ -134,12 +134,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0,,
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",,,
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,,,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0,,
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0,,
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0,,
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0,,
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2020.csv b/outputs/costs_2020.csv
index 1dbe1cc7..74aeb012 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2020.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2020.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2025.csv b/outputs/costs_2025.csv
index bb26c697..a99a138a 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2025.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2025.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2030.csv b/outputs/costs_2030.csv
index aafd3b65..431e5cf8 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2030.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2030.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2035.csv b/outputs/costs_2035.csv
index 6b6cb09d..e884773d 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2035.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2035.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2040.csv b/outputs/costs_2040.csv
index 61c88a65..59666785 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2040.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2040.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2045.csv b/outputs/costs_2045.csv
index 0a04f69e..f3214b1d 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2045.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2045.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
diff --git a/outputs/costs_2050.csv b/outputs/costs_2050.csv
index f5570cf9..0b9fa358 100644
--- a/outputs/costs_2050.csv
+++ b/outputs/costs_2050.csv
@@ -103,12 +103,11 @@ CH4 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.036,MWh_el/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019
 CH4 liquefaction,investment,307.4924,EUR/kW_CH4,"Calculated, based on Lochner and Bothe (2009): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.012 and Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306","based on 265 MUSD-2005/(1 bcm/a), 1 bcm = 10.6 TWh, currency exchange rate: 1.15 USD=1 EUR.",2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Fasihi et al 2017, table 1, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/306",,2005.0
 CH4 liquefaction,methane-input,1.0,MWh_CH4/MWh_CH4,"Pospíšil et al. (2019): Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027), Table 2 and Table 3. alternative source 2: https://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/methane (accessed 2021-02-10).","For refrigeration cycle, cleaning of gas presumed unnecessary as it should be nearly pure CH4 (=SNG). Assuming energy required is only electricity which is for Table 3 in the source provided with efficiencies of ~50% of LHV, making the numbers consistent with the numbers in Table 2.",
-CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Assuming a pure, humid, low-pressure input stream. Neglecting possible gross-effects of CO2 which might be cycled for the cooling process.",
-CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.123,MWh_el/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,,
-CO2 liquefaction,heat-input,0.0067,MWh_th/t_CO2,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,For drying purposes.,
-CO2 liquefaction,investment,21.2764,EUR/t_CO2/h,Mitsubish Heavy Industries Ltd. and IEA (2004): https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/PH4-30%20Ship%20Transport.pdf .,"Plant capacity of 20 kt CO2 / d and an uptime of 85%. For a high purity, humid, low pressure input stream, includes drying and compression necessary for liquefaction.",2004.0
-CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2004.0
+CO2 liquefaction,FOM,5.0,%/year,Table 4-11 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,1.0,t_CO2/t_CO2,,,
+CO2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.1051,MWh_el/t_CO2,Table 4-10 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,
+CO2 liquefaction,investment,34120.2,EUR/t_CO2/h,Table 4-5 + 4-6 operation point 15 AIT Study https://www.ait.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2Netz_Bericht_241007.pdf,,2024.0
+CO2 liquefaction,lifetime,25.0,years,"Guesstimate, based on CH4 liquefaction.",,2024.0
 CO2 pipeline,FOM,0.9,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,investment,2671.6062,EUR/(tCO2/h)/km,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",Assuming the 120-500 t CO2/h range that is based on cost of a 12 inch onshore pipeline.,2015.0
 CO2 pipeline,lifetime,50.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Energy Transport (March 2021), Excel datasheet: 121 co2 pipeline.",,2015.0