You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
This function modifies the original gpt pre-training config (gpt_cfg) with attributes from the finetuning config (cfg).
55
-
The `add_cfg_to_tree` arg adds `cfg` to the top of the yaml tree which is needed for all `hparams.yaml` files when passed as an arg to `load_from_checkpoint()`.
prompt_str="""<extra_id_0>System\n\n<extra_id_1>User\nDoes GPT-4 use RNN or Transformer models, and which one is better for this type of project?\n<extra_id_1>Assistant\nGPT-4 uses a transformer architecture, not a recurrent neural network. Both models are commonly used for natural language processing tasks, and both have advantages and disadvantages, so it depends on the specific application of the model.\n<extra_id_1>User\nCould you explain in detail both the advantages and disadvantages from different perspectives?\n<extra_id_1>Assistant\nYes, here are a few different perspectives on the pros and cons of RNN and transformer models:\n\n\n The RNN model has better sequential memory and can better model sequences of data, whereas the transformer model has better parallel computation and can better model large input datasets. This makes RNNs better for applications like speech recognition and machine translation, where the input is a sequence of sounds or words, and transformers better for applications like natural language processing and text classification, where the input is a large collection of documents or social media posts.\n\n\n RNNs are more straightforward and easier to understand and debug, whereas transformers are more flexible and can be used for more diverse applications. This makes RNNs better for teaching and research, and transformers better for actual applications in industry and the real world.\n\n\n RNNs are more efficient and faster to run, whereas transformers are more accurate and produce better results. This makes RNNs better for fast prototyping and testing, and transformers better for actual deployment in production applications.\n<extra_id_1>User\ncould you add more in a table\n<extra_id_1>Assistant\n"""
150
+
151
+
expected_oai_messages= [
152
+
{"role": "system", "content": ""},
153
+
{
154
+
"role": "user",
155
+
"content": "Does GPT-4 use RNN or Transformer models, and which one is better for this type of project?",
156
+
},
157
+
{
158
+
"role": "assistant",
159
+
"content": "GPT-4 uses a transformer architecture, not a recurrent neural network. Both models are commonly used for natural language processing tasks, and both have advantages and disadvantages, so it depends on the specific application of the model.",
160
+
},
161
+
{
162
+
"role": "user",
163
+
"content": "Could you explain in detail both the advantages and disadvantages from different perspectives?",
164
+
},
165
+
{
166
+
"role": "assistant",
167
+
"content": """Yes, here are a few different perspectives on the pros and cons of RNN and transformer models:\n\n\n The RNN model has better sequential memory and can better model sequences of data, whereas the transformer model has better parallel computation and can better model large input datasets. This makes RNNs better for applications like speech recognition and machine translation, where the input is a sequence of sounds or words, and transformers better for applications like natural language processing and text classification, where the input is a large collection of documents or social media posts.\n\n\n RNNs are more straightforward and easier to understand and debug, whereas transformers are more flexible and can be used for more diverse applications. This makes RNNs better for teaching and research, and transformers better for actual applications in industry and the real world.\n\n\n RNNs are more efficient and faster to run, whereas transformers are more accurate and produce better results. This makes RNNs better for fast prototyping and testing, and transformers better for actual deployment in production applications.""",
168
+
},
169
+
{"role": "user", "content": "could you add more in a table"},
0 commit comments