Mistake in workshop example..I think

[abdelhaq-ourosama]

Hello,

There seems to be a mistake in the workshop example. The section named exterior_main_beam_i is actually referred to as edge_longitudinal_section, as deduced from the characteristics and the YouTube video.

The edge_longitudinal_section is used to create the edge_longitudinal_beam — so far, so good. However, the edge_longitudinal_beam has been incorrectly assigned to edge_beam.

Additionally, the edge_beam section and member is missing.

Also, edge_longitudinal_section should be assigned with the exterior_main_beam_i

Did I get it right or am I missing something?

[ccaprani]

Thanks for flagging this. We've reviewed the current workshop notebook (examples/workshop/super-t_example-final.ipynb) and the naming is consistent:

• edge_longitudinal_section → edge_longitudinal_beam → assigned to "edge_beam"
• longitudinal_section → longitudinal_beam → assigned to "interior_main_beam", "exterior_main_beam_1", "exterior_main_beam_2"

This appears to have been corrected in a prior update. Closing — please reopen if you're still seeing an inconsistency.