From e4ac20f5ca79c166b5181329ec16ecce9c2da6c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oksana Kolisnyk Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 15:37:51 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add research quest system --- RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md | 241 ++++++++++++++++++ .../research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md | 213 ++++++++++++++++ assets/js/quest.js | 44 +++- 3 files changed, 491 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md create mode 100644 RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md diff --git a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..66c320b --- /dev/null +++ b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +# ๐Ÿ”ฌ Research Quest: [Title] + +**๐ŸŽฏ Focus:** [Research Area] | **โฑ๏ธ Time:** [X hours] | **๐Ÿ“Š Difficulty:** [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced] +**๐Ÿ“ Source:** [Repository/Files] | **โœจ Status:** ๐Ÿ“ Draft / ๐Ÿ‘€ Review / โœ… Approved + +--- + +## ๐Ÿงญ Research Context + +**๐ŸŒ Background:** +[Brief description of the research area and why it matters - make it engaging!] + +**๐Ÿ“š Source Material:** +- ๐Ÿ“ Repository: `[Source Repo]` +- ๐Ÿ“‚ Specific files: `[path/to/files]` +- ๐Ÿ”— Key references: `[links if applicable]` + +--- + +## ๐ŸŽฏ Research Objective + +**โ“ Main Question:** +[What specific research question does this quest address?] + +**๐Ÿ’ก Hypothesis:** +[What hypothesis are we testing or exploring?] + +**๐ŸŽ Expected Outcome:** +[What do we expect to learn or validate?] + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Phase 1: ๐Ÿ” Exploration (30-60 min) + +### ๐Ÿ“– Literature Scan +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“š Review existing documentation in the source repository +- [ ] ๐Ÿ” Identify key concepts and terminology +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Note gaps or unclear areas +- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก List questions that arise + +### ๐Ÿ’ป Code/Data Investigation +- [ ] ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Examine the structure of the source code/data +- [ ] โ–ถ๏ธ Run existing examples (if applicable) +- [ ] ๐Ÿ› Document what works and what doesn't +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ธ Take screenshots of key findings + +**๐Ÿ“ Notes:** +``` +Initial observations: +- Repository structure: [document what you find] +- Key files identified: [list files] +- Documentation quality: [assess with emoji rating ๐Ÿ˜Š/๐Ÿ˜/๐Ÿ˜ž] +- Surprises discovered: [any unexpected findings] +``` + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Phase 2: ๐Ÿ”ฌ Hands-On Investigation (2-4 hours) + +### ๐ŸŽฏ Task 1: [Specific Task Name] +**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** [What are you trying to achieve?] + +**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** +1. [First step] ๐Ÿ“ +2. [Second step] ๐Ÿ“ +3. [Third step] ๐Ÿ“ + +**โœ… Expected Result:** [What should happen?] + +**๐Ÿ” Actual Result:** [What actually happened?] + +**โš ๏ธ Issues Encountered:** [Any problems?] + +--- + +### ๐ŸŽฏ Task 2: [Specific Task Name] +**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** [What are you trying to achieve?] + +**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** +1. [First step] ๐Ÿ“ +2. [Second step] ๐Ÿ“ + +**โœ… Expected Result:** [What should happen?] + +**๐Ÿ” Actual Result:** [What actually happened?] + +**โš ๏ธ Issues Encountered:** [Any problems?] + +--- + +### ๐Ÿ”„ Task 3: Reproducibility Check +**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** Can someone else reproduce this investigation? + +**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** +1. ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Document your environment (OS, Python version, dependencies) +2. ๐Ÿ“ฆ Create a minimal reproducible example +3. ๐Ÿงช Test on a different setup (if possible) +4. ๐Ÿ“ Document any environment-specific issues + +**๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility Score:** [1-5 scale] โญโญโญโญโญ + +**๐Ÿ“ฆ Environment Details:** +- OS: [your OS] ๐Ÿ’ป +- Python version: [version] ๐Ÿ +- Key dependencies: [list] ๐Ÿ“ฆ + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ“Š Phase 3: ๐Ÿง  Analysis & Synthesis (60-90 min) + +### ๐Ÿ”‘ Key Findings +1. [Finding 1] ๐Ÿ” +2. [Finding 2] ๐Ÿ” +3. [Finding 3] ๐Ÿ” + +### ๐ŸŽ‰ Unexpected Discoveries +- [Any surprises or unexpected results] ๐ŸŽ + +### โš ๏ธ Limitations +- [What are the limitations of this investigation?] ๐Ÿšง + +### ๐Ÿ”— Connections to Other Research +- [How does this connect to other S/E/T research areas?] ๐Ÿ”— + +### ๐Ÿ“ˆ Impact Assessment +**๐ŸŽฏ Impact Level:** [Low/Medium/High] ๐Ÿ“Š +**๐ŸŒ Cross-sphere relevance:** [S/E/T connections] ๐ŸŒ + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ“ Phase 4: ๐Ÿ“š Documentation (30-60 min) + +### ๐Ÿ“„ Research Summary +[Write a 2-3 paragraph summary of the entire investigation - make it clear and engaging!] + +### ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations + +**๐Ÿš€ Immediate Actions:** +- [ ] [Action 1] โšก +- [ ] [Action 2] โšก +- [ ] [Action 3] โšก + +**๐Ÿ”ฎ Medium-term Improvements:** +- [ ] [Improvement 1] ๐ŸŽฏ +- [ ] [Improvement 2] ๐ŸŽฏ +- [ ] [Improvement 3] ๐ŸŽฏ + +**๐ŸŒŸ Long-term Vision:** +- [ ] [Vision 1] ๐Ÿš€ +- [ ] [Vision 2] ๐Ÿš€ +- [ ] [Vision 3] ๐Ÿš€ + +### ๐Ÿ“‹ Pull Request Proposal +If this investigation leads to actionable changes: + +**๐Ÿ“Œ Title:** [PR Title] +**๐Ÿ“ Description:** [Brief description of proposed changes] +**๐Ÿ“ Files to modify:** [List of files] +**๐Ÿงช Testing approach:** [How to verify the changes] +**๐Ÿ‘ฅ Reviewers:** [Who should review?] + +--- + +## ๐Ÿค” Reflection Questions + +- ๐Ÿ˜Š Did the investigation match your expectations? +- ๐Ÿ˜ฐ What was the most challenging part? +- ๐Ÿ’ก What would you do differently next time? +- ๐ŸŒŸ How does this contribute to the broader research goals? +- ๐ŸŽ“ What did you learn that surprised you? + +**๐Ÿ“ Your Reflections:** +``` +[Space for your personal reflections] +``` + +--- + +## โœ… Approval Criteria + +This research quest is ready for merge when: +- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ All phases completed +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“Š Findings documented clearly +- [ ] ๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility verified (score 3+) +- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations actionable +- [ ] ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Peer review completed +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Documentation updated + +**๐ŸŽฏ Approval Status:** [Pending Review / Approved / Rejected] + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ“Š Metadata + +**๐Ÿ“… Created:** [Date] ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ +**๐Ÿ”„ Last Updated:** [Date] ๐Ÿ”„ +**๐Ÿ‘ฅ Contributors:** [Names] ๐Ÿ‘ค +**๐Ÿ”— Related Issues:** [Links to GitHub issues] ๐Ÿ”— +**๐Ÿท๏ธ Tags:** [research, sphere-specific tags] ๐Ÿท๏ธ +**โญ Difficulty Rating:** [1-5] โญโญโญโญโญ +**๐ŸŽฏ Priority:** [Low/Medium/High] ๐ŸŽฏ + +--- + +## ๐ŸŽ‰ Quest Completion Checklist + +**Phase 1 - Exploration:** +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“– Literature scan completed +- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ป Code/data investigation done +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Initial notes documented + +**Phase 2 - Hands-On:** +- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ Task 1 completed +- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ Task 2 completed +- [ ] ๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility checked + +**Phase 3 - Analysis:** +- [ ] ๐Ÿ”‘ Key findings identified +- [ ] ๐ŸŽ‰ Unexpected discoveries noted +- [ ] โš ๏ธ Limitations documented +- [ ] ๐Ÿ”— Connections mapped + +**Phase 4 - Documentation:** +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“„ Summary written +- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations listed +- [ ] ๐Ÿ“‹ PR proposal ready +- [ ] ๐Ÿค” Reflections completed + +**๐ŸŽŠ Overall Progress:** [0% - 100%] ๐Ÿ“Š + +--- + +## ๐Ÿ’ฌ Notes & Comments + +[Space for additional notes, comments, or collaboration] + +--- + +*๐Ÿ”ฌ This research quest follows the SET methodology for reproducible computational science research* +*๐ŸŒ Part of the K-RnD-Lab research ecosystem* +*๐Ÿ“ง Questions? Open an issue or start a discussion* diff --git a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..67aeebe --- /dev/null +++ b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ +# Research Quest 01 โ€” AI & Data Analysis Pipeline Investigation + +**Title:** Exploring Data Analysis Pipeline in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY +**Sphere:** T | **Source:** K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY | **Status:** Draft +**Time Estimate:** 3-4 hours | **Difficulty:** Intermediate + +--- + +## Research Context + +**Background:** +Data analysis pipelines are critical for reproducible research in computational science. This quest investigates the existing data processing tools in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY to understand their capabilities, limitations, and potential improvements. + +**Source Material:** +- Repository: `K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY` +- Focus areas: Data processing tools, ML pipelines, analytical engines +- Related: T1 โ€” Research Tools, ML & Analytical Engines + +--- + +## Research Objective + +**Main Question:** +What data analysis capabilities currently exist in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY, and how can they be improved for reproducible research? + +**Hypothesis:** +The repository contains modular data processing tools that can be composed into reproducible pipelines, but documentation and examples may be incomplete. + +**Expected Outcome:** +- Clear understanding of existing data tools +- Identification of gaps in documentation +- Concrete recommendations for improvement + +--- + +## Phase 1: Exploration (60 min) + +### Literature Scan +- [ ] Review README.md in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY +- [ ] Examine T1 directory structure +- [ ] Identify key data processing files +- [ ] Note dependencies and requirements + +### Code Investigation +- [ ] Clone or navigate to SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY +- [ ] List all Python/data processing files +- [ ] Check for existing examples or notebooks +- [ ] Identify test files that demonstrate usage + +**Notes:** +``` +Initial observations: +- Repository structure: [document what you find] +- Key files identified: [list files] +- Documentation quality: [assess] +``` + +--- + +## Phase 2: Hands-On Investigation (2-3 hours) + +### Task 1: Tool Inventory +**Goal:** Catalog all data analysis tools in the repository + +**Steps:** +1. Search for files with patterns: `*data*.py`, `*pipeline*.py`, `*analysis*.py` +2. For each file found, document: + - Purpose (from docstrings or comments) + - Input/output formats + - Dependencies +3. Create a table of tools with metadata + +**Expected Result:** Comprehensive inventory of data tools + +**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] + +--- + +### Task 2: Reproducibility Test +**Goal:** Test if existing examples can be run successfully + +**Steps:** +1. Find example scripts or notebooks +2. Set up a clean environment (virtual environment) +3. Install dependencies from requirements.txt or setup.py +4. Run the example +5. Document any errors or missing dependencies + +**Expected Result:** Examples run without errors + +**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] + +**Environment:** +- OS: [your OS] +- Python version: [version] +- Key dependencies: [list] + +--- + +### Task 3: Pipeline Composition +**Goal:** Attempt to compose tools into a simple pipeline + +**Steps:** +1. Select 2-3 related tools from inventory +2. Design a simple workflow (e.g., load โ†’ process โ†’ visualize) +3. Implement the pipeline +4. Test with sample data +5. Document the process + +**Expected Result:** Working pipeline with documentation + +**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] + +--- + +## Phase 3: Analysis & Synthesis (60-90 min) + +### Key Findings +1. [Finding 1 - e.g., "Found 5 data processing tools but only 2 have examples"] +2. [Finding 2 - e.g., "Tool X requires undocumented dependency Y"] +3. [Finding 3 - e.g., "Pipeline composition is straightforward but lacks error handling"] + +### Unexpected Discoveries +- [Any surprises - e.g., "Found a hidden utility that simplifies data loading"] + +### Limitations +- Investigation limited to T1 directory +- Did not test with large datasets +- Environment-specific issues may affect reproducibility + +### Connections to Other Research +- This connects to S sphere research that needs data processing +- E sphere could use these tools for market intelligence +- Potential for cross-sphere standardization + +--- + +## Phase 4: Documentation (60 min) + +### Research Summary +This investigation explored the data analysis capabilities in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY. We identified [number] data processing tools, tested [number] examples, and composed [number] pipelines. Key findings include [brief summary]. The tools show promise for reproducible research but need improved documentation and examples. + +### Recommendations + +**Immediate Actions:** +- Add example notebooks for each major tool +- Create a "Getting Started" guide for pipeline composition +- Document all dependencies clearly + +**Medium-term Improvements:** +- Implement standard error handling across tools +- Add unit tests for critical functions +- Create template pipeline scripts + +**Long-term Vision:** +- Develop a unified pipeline orchestration framework +- Integrate with S sphere research workflows +- Create cross-sphere data standards + +### Pull Request Proposal + +**Title:** Improve data analysis tool documentation and examples + +**Description:** +This PR adds example notebooks, improves documentation, and creates a getting started guide for data analysis tools in T1. + +**Files to modify:** +- `T1/README.md` - add getting started section +- `T1/examples/` - create new example notebooks +- `T1/docs/` - add detailed tool documentation + +**Testing approach:** +- Run all new examples in clean environment +- Verify documentation builds without errors +- Get feedback from at least one other researcher + +--- + +## Reflection Questions + +- Did the investigation match your expectations? + - [Your answer] + +- What was the most challenging part? + - [Your answer - e.g., "Setting up the environment took longer than expected"] + +- What would you do differently next time? + - [Your answer - e.g., "Start with dependency check before code investigation"] + +- How does this contribute to the broader research goals? + - [Your answer - e.g., "Better documented tools enable faster research across all spheres"] + +--- + +## Approval Criteria + +This research quest is ready for merge when: +- [ ] All phases completed +- [ ] Tool inventory table filled +- [ ] At least one pipeline composed and tested +- [ ] Findings documented clearly +- [ ] Recommendations include specific file paths +- [ ] Peer review completed + +--- + +## Metadata + +**Created:** 2026-05-16 +**Last Updated:** [Date when completed] +**Contributors:** [Your name] +**Related Issues:** [Link to GitHub issue if created] +**Tags:** research, data-analysis, reproducibility, T-sphere, pipeline diff --git a/assets/js/quest.js b/assets/js/quest.js index f8e4ac7..89065ee 100644 --- a/assets/js/quest.js +++ b/assets/js/quest.js @@ -15,27 +15,42 @@ const quests = [ {id:"T3",sphere:"T",dir:"T3 - Dashboards, Interfaces & Open Infrastructure",label:"๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ T3 Dashboards & Infra"} ]; +// Research quests from RESEARCH-QUESTS folder +const researchQuests = [ + {id:"R1",sphere:"R",dir:"research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline",label:"๐Ÿ”ฌ R1 AI & Data Pipeline Investigation"}, + {id:"R2",sphere:"R",dir:"research-quest-02-reproducibility-check",label:"๐Ÿ”ฌ R2 Reproducibility Check"}, + {id:"R3",sphere:"R",dir:"research-quest-03-method-validation",label:"๐Ÿ”ฌ R3 Method Validation"} +]; + const REPO_MAP = { S:"K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-I-SCIENCE", E:"K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-II-ENTREPRENEURSHIP", - T:"K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY" + T:"K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY", + R:"K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-FRONTIER" }; + const nav = document.getElementById("questNav"); const content = document.getElementById("mdContent"); function buildNav(){ - const groups = {S:[],E:[],T:[]}; + const groups = {S:[],E:[],T:[],R:[]}; quests.forEach(q => groups[q.sphere].push(q)); - const labels = {S:"Science",E:"Entrepreneurship",T:"Technology"}; + researchQuests.forEach(q => groups[q.sphere].push(q)); + + const labels = {S:"Science",E:"Entrepreneurship",T:"Technology",R:"Research Quests"}; let html = `โ† K R&D Lab

Quests

`; + Object.entries(groups).forEach(([sphere,items]) => { + if(items.length === 0) return; html += ``; }); + nav.innerHTML = html; + nav.querySelectorAll("a[data-dir]").forEach(a => { a.addEventListener("click", e => { e.preventDefault(); @@ -47,16 +62,30 @@ function buildNav(){ } async function loadQuest(dir, sphere){ - const repo = REPO_MAP[sphere]; - const url = `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${repo}/main/${dir}/README.md`; + let url; + if(sphere === "R"){ + // Research quests are in the same repo (SPHERE-FRONTIER) + url = `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-FRONTIER/TEZv-research/RESEARCH-QUESTS/${dir}.md`; + } else { + const repo = REPO_MAP[sphere]; + url = `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${repo}/main/${dir}/README.md`; + } + content.innerHTML = "

Loading quest...

"; + try { const res = await fetch(url); if(!res.ok) throw new Error(res.status); const md = await res.text(); content.innerHTML = marked.parse(md); } catch(err) { - const ghUrl = `https://github.com/${repo}/tree/main/${dir}`; + let ghUrl; + if(sphere === "R"){ + ghUrl = `https://github.com/K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-FRONTIER/tree/TEZv-research/RESEARCH-QUESTS`; + } else { + const repo = REPO_MAP[sphere]; + ghUrl = `https://github.com/${repo}/tree/main/${dir}`; + } content.innerHTML = `

Could not load quest. Open on GitHub โ†’

`; } } @@ -65,7 +94,8 @@ buildNav(); const hash = location.hash.slice(1); if(hash){ - const q = quests.find(q => q.id === hash); + const allQuests = [...quests, ...researchQuests]; + const q = allQuests.find(q => q.id === hash); if(q){ const a = nav.querySelector(`a[href="#${q.id}"]`); if(a){ a.classList.add("active"); loadQuest(q.dir, q.sphere); } From 4d0bb9002fc1794338fd8717b76d0bf0ddeae679 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oksana Kolisnyk Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 20:10:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Remove RESEARCH-QUESTS from SPHERE-FRONTIER --- RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md | 241 ------------------ .../research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md | 213 ---------------- 2 files changed, 454 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md delete mode 100644 RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md diff --git a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md deleted file mode 100644 index 66c320b..0000000 --- a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/_TEMPLATE.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,241 +0,0 @@ -# ๐Ÿ”ฌ Research Quest: [Title] - -**๐ŸŽฏ Focus:** [Research Area] | **โฑ๏ธ Time:** [X hours] | **๐Ÿ“Š Difficulty:** [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced] -**๐Ÿ“ Source:** [Repository/Files] | **โœจ Status:** ๐Ÿ“ Draft / ๐Ÿ‘€ Review / โœ… Approved - ---- - -## ๐Ÿงญ Research Context - -**๐ŸŒ Background:** -[Brief description of the research area and why it matters - make it engaging!] - -**๐Ÿ“š Source Material:** -- ๐Ÿ“ Repository: `[Source Repo]` -- ๐Ÿ“‚ Specific files: `[path/to/files]` -- ๐Ÿ”— Key references: `[links if applicable]` - ---- - -## ๐ŸŽฏ Research Objective - -**โ“ Main Question:** -[What specific research question does this quest address?] - -**๐Ÿ’ก Hypothesis:** -[What hypothesis are we testing or exploring?] - -**๐ŸŽ Expected Outcome:** -[What do we expect to learn or validate?] - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Phase 1: ๐Ÿ” Exploration (30-60 min) - -### ๐Ÿ“– Literature Scan -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“š Review existing documentation in the source repository -- [ ] ๐Ÿ” Identify key concepts and terminology -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Note gaps or unclear areas -- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก List questions that arise - -### ๐Ÿ’ป Code/Data Investigation -- [ ] ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Examine the structure of the source code/data -- [ ] โ–ถ๏ธ Run existing examples (if applicable) -- [ ] ๐Ÿ› Document what works and what doesn't -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ธ Take screenshots of key findings - -**๐Ÿ“ Notes:** -``` -Initial observations: -- Repository structure: [document what you find] -- Key files identified: [list files] -- Documentation quality: [assess with emoji rating ๐Ÿ˜Š/๐Ÿ˜/๐Ÿ˜ž] -- Surprises discovered: [any unexpected findings] -``` - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Phase 2: ๐Ÿ”ฌ Hands-On Investigation (2-4 hours) - -### ๐ŸŽฏ Task 1: [Specific Task Name] -**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** [What are you trying to achieve?] - -**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** -1. [First step] ๐Ÿ“ -2. [Second step] ๐Ÿ“ -3. [Third step] ๐Ÿ“ - -**โœ… Expected Result:** [What should happen?] - -**๐Ÿ” Actual Result:** [What actually happened?] - -**โš ๏ธ Issues Encountered:** [Any problems?] - ---- - -### ๐ŸŽฏ Task 2: [Specific Task Name] -**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** [What are you trying to achieve?] - -**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** -1. [First step] ๐Ÿ“ -2. [Second step] ๐Ÿ“ - -**โœ… Expected Result:** [What should happen?] - -**๐Ÿ” Actual Result:** [What actually happened?] - -**โš ๏ธ Issues Encountered:** [Any problems?] - ---- - -### ๐Ÿ”„ Task 3: Reproducibility Check -**๐ŸŽฏ Goal:** Can someone else reproduce this investigation? - -**๐Ÿ“‹ Steps:** -1. ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Document your environment (OS, Python version, dependencies) -2. ๐Ÿ“ฆ Create a minimal reproducible example -3. ๐Ÿงช Test on a different setup (if possible) -4. ๐Ÿ“ Document any environment-specific issues - -**๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility Score:** [1-5 scale] โญโญโญโญโญ - -**๐Ÿ“ฆ Environment Details:** -- OS: [your OS] ๐Ÿ’ป -- Python version: [version] ๐Ÿ -- Key dependencies: [list] ๐Ÿ“ฆ - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ“Š Phase 3: ๐Ÿง  Analysis & Synthesis (60-90 min) - -### ๐Ÿ”‘ Key Findings -1. [Finding 1] ๐Ÿ” -2. [Finding 2] ๐Ÿ” -3. [Finding 3] ๐Ÿ” - -### ๐ŸŽ‰ Unexpected Discoveries -- [Any surprises or unexpected results] ๐ŸŽ - -### โš ๏ธ Limitations -- [What are the limitations of this investigation?] ๐Ÿšง - -### ๐Ÿ”— Connections to Other Research -- [How does this connect to other S/E/T research areas?] ๐Ÿ”— - -### ๐Ÿ“ˆ Impact Assessment -**๐ŸŽฏ Impact Level:** [Low/Medium/High] ๐Ÿ“Š -**๐ŸŒ Cross-sphere relevance:** [S/E/T connections] ๐ŸŒ - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ“ Phase 4: ๐Ÿ“š Documentation (30-60 min) - -### ๐Ÿ“„ Research Summary -[Write a 2-3 paragraph summary of the entire investigation - make it clear and engaging!] - -### ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations - -**๐Ÿš€ Immediate Actions:** -- [ ] [Action 1] โšก -- [ ] [Action 2] โšก -- [ ] [Action 3] โšก - -**๐Ÿ”ฎ Medium-term Improvements:** -- [ ] [Improvement 1] ๐ŸŽฏ -- [ ] [Improvement 2] ๐ŸŽฏ -- [ ] [Improvement 3] ๐ŸŽฏ - -**๐ŸŒŸ Long-term Vision:** -- [ ] [Vision 1] ๐Ÿš€ -- [ ] [Vision 2] ๐Ÿš€ -- [ ] [Vision 3] ๐Ÿš€ - -### ๐Ÿ“‹ Pull Request Proposal -If this investigation leads to actionable changes: - -**๐Ÿ“Œ Title:** [PR Title] -**๐Ÿ“ Description:** [Brief description of proposed changes] -**๐Ÿ“ Files to modify:** [List of files] -**๐Ÿงช Testing approach:** [How to verify the changes] -**๐Ÿ‘ฅ Reviewers:** [Who should review?] - ---- - -## ๐Ÿค” Reflection Questions - -- ๐Ÿ˜Š Did the investigation match your expectations? -- ๐Ÿ˜ฐ What was the most challenging part? -- ๐Ÿ’ก What would you do differently next time? -- ๐ŸŒŸ How does this contribute to the broader research goals? -- ๐ŸŽ“ What did you learn that surprised you? - -**๐Ÿ“ Your Reflections:** -``` -[Space for your personal reflections] -``` - ---- - -## โœ… Approval Criteria - -This research quest is ready for merge when: -- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ All phases completed -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“Š Findings documented clearly -- [ ] ๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility verified (score 3+) -- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations actionable -- [ ] ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Peer review completed -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Documentation updated - -**๐ŸŽฏ Approval Status:** [Pending Review / Approved / Rejected] - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ“Š Metadata - -**๐Ÿ“… Created:** [Date] ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ -**๐Ÿ”„ Last Updated:** [Date] ๐Ÿ”„ -**๐Ÿ‘ฅ Contributors:** [Names] ๐Ÿ‘ค -**๐Ÿ”— Related Issues:** [Links to GitHub issues] ๐Ÿ”— -**๐Ÿท๏ธ Tags:** [research, sphere-specific tags] ๐Ÿท๏ธ -**โญ Difficulty Rating:** [1-5] โญโญโญโญโญ -**๐ŸŽฏ Priority:** [Low/Medium/High] ๐ŸŽฏ - ---- - -## ๐ŸŽ‰ Quest Completion Checklist - -**Phase 1 - Exploration:** -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“– Literature scan completed -- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ป Code/data investigation done -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“ Initial notes documented - -**Phase 2 - Hands-On:** -- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ Task 1 completed -- [ ] ๐ŸŽฏ Task 2 completed -- [ ] ๐Ÿ”„ Reproducibility checked - -**Phase 3 - Analysis:** -- [ ] ๐Ÿ”‘ Key findings identified -- [ ] ๐ŸŽ‰ Unexpected discoveries noted -- [ ] โš ๏ธ Limitations documented -- [ ] ๐Ÿ”— Connections mapped - -**Phase 4 - Documentation:** -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“„ Summary written -- [ ] ๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations listed -- [ ] ๐Ÿ“‹ PR proposal ready -- [ ] ๐Ÿค” Reflections completed - -**๐ŸŽŠ Overall Progress:** [0% - 100%] ๐Ÿ“Š - ---- - -## ๐Ÿ’ฌ Notes & Comments - -[Space for additional notes, comments, or collaboration] - ---- - -*๐Ÿ”ฌ This research quest follows the SET methodology for reproducible computational science research* -*๐ŸŒ Part of the K-RnD-Lab research ecosystem* -*๐Ÿ“ง Questions? Open an issue or start a discussion* diff --git a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md b/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md deleted file mode 100644 index 67aeebe..0000000 --- a/RESEARCH-QUESTS/research-quest-01-ai-data-pipeline.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,213 +0,0 @@ -# Research Quest 01 โ€” AI & Data Analysis Pipeline Investigation - -**Title:** Exploring Data Analysis Pipeline in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY -**Sphere:** T | **Source:** K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY | **Status:** Draft -**Time Estimate:** 3-4 hours | **Difficulty:** Intermediate - ---- - -## Research Context - -**Background:** -Data analysis pipelines are critical for reproducible research in computational science. This quest investigates the existing data processing tools in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY to understand their capabilities, limitations, and potential improvements. - -**Source Material:** -- Repository: `K-RnD-Lab/SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY` -- Focus areas: Data processing tools, ML pipelines, analytical engines -- Related: T1 โ€” Research Tools, ML & Analytical Engines - ---- - -## Research Objective - -**Main Question:** -What data analysis capabilities currently exist in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY, and how can they be improved for reproducible research? - -**Hypothesis:** -The repository contains modular data processing tools that can be composed into reproducible pipelines, but documentation and examples may be incomplete. - -**Expected Outcome:** -- Clear understanding of existing data tools -- Identification of gaps in documentation -- Concrete recommendations for improvement - ---- - -## Phase 1: Exploration (60 min) - -### Literature Scan -- [ ] Review README.md in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY -- [ ] Examine T1 directory structure -- [ ] Identify key data processing files -- [ ] Note dependencies and requirements - -### Code Investigation -- [ ] Clone or navigate to SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY -- [ ] List all Python/data processing files -- [ ] Check for existing examples or notebooks -- [ ] Identify test files that demonstrate usage - -**Notes:** -``` -Initial observations: -- Repository structure: [document what you find] -- Key files identified: [list files] -- Documentation quality: [assess] -``` - ---- - -## Phase 2: Hands-On Investigation (2-3 hours) - -### Task 1: Tool Inventory -**Goal:** Catalog all data analysis tools in the repository - -**Steps:** -1. Search for files with patterns: `*data*.py`, `*pipeline*.py`, `*analysis*.py` -2. For each file found, document: - - Purpose (from docstrings or comments) - - Input/output formats - - Dependencies -3. Create a table of tools with metadata - -**Expected Result:** Comprehensive inventory of data tools - -**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] - ---- - -### Task 2: Reproducibility Test -**Goal:** Test if existing examples can be run successfully - -**Steps:** -1. Find example scripts or notebooks -2. Set up a clean environment (virtual environment) -3. Install dependencies from requirements.txt or setup.py -4. Run the example -5. Document any errors or missing dependencies - -**Expected Result:** Examples run without errors - -**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] - -**Environment:** -- OS: [your OS] -- Python version: [version] -- Key dependencies: [list] - ---- - -### Task 3: Pipeline Composition -**Goal:** Attempt to compose tools into a simple pipeline - -**Steps:** -1. Select 2-3 related tools from inventory -2. Design a simple workflow (e.g., load โ†’ process โ†’ visualize) -3. Implement the pipeline -4. Test with sample data -5. Document the process - -**Expected Result:** Working pipeline with documentation - -**Actual Result:** [Fill after investigation] - ---- - -## Phase 3: Analysis & Synthesis (60-90 min) - -### Key Findings -1. [Finding 1 - e.g., "Found 5 data processing tools but only 2 have examples"] -2. [Finding 2 - e.g., "Tool X requires undocumented dependency Y"] -3. [Finding 3 - e.g., "Pipeline composition is straightforward but lacks error handling"] - -### Unexpected Discoveries -- [Any surprises - e.g., "Found a hidden utility that simplifies data loading"] - -### Limitations -- Investigation limited to T1 directory -- Did not test with large datasets -- Environment-specific issues may affect reproducibility - -### Connections to Other Research -- This connects to S sphere research that needs data processing -- E sphere could use these tools for market intelligence -- Potential for cross-sphere standardization - ---- - -## Phase 4: Documentation (60 min) - -### Research Summary -This investigation explored the data analysis capabilities in SPHERE-III-TECHNOLOGY. We identified [number] data processing tools, tested [number] examples, and composed [number] pipelines. Key findings include [brief summary]. The tools show promise for reproducible research but need improved documentation and examples. - -### Recommendations - -**Immediate Actions:** -- Add example notebooks for each major tool -- Create a "Getting Started" guide for pipeline composition -- Document all dependencies clearly - -**Medium-term Improvements:** -- Implement standard error handling across tools -- Add unit tests for critical functions -- Create template pipeline scripts - -**Long-term Vision:** -- Develop a unified pipeline orchestration framework -- Integrate with S sphere research workflows -- Create cross-sphere data standards - -### Pull Request Proposal - -**Title:** Improve data analysis tool documentation and examples - -**Description:** -This PR adds example notebooks, improves documentation, and creates a getting started guide for data analysis tools in T1. - -**Files to modify:** -- `T1/README.md` - add getting started section -- `T1/examples/` - create new example notebooks -- `T1/docs/` - add detailed tool documentation - -**Testing approach:** -- Run all new examples in clean environment -- Verify documentation builds without errors -- Get feedback from at least one other researcher - ---- - -## Reflection Questions - -- Did the investigation match your expectations? - - [Your answer] - -- What was the most challenging part? - - [Your answer - e.g., "Setting up the environment took longer than expected"] - -- What would you do differently next time? - - [Your answer - e.g., "Start with dependency check before code investigation"] - -- How does this contribute to the broader research goals? - - [Your answer - e.g., "Better documented tools enable faster research across all spheres"] - ---- - -## Approval Criteria - -This research quest is ready for merge when: -- [ ] All phases completed -- [ ] Tool inventory table filled -- [ ] At least one pipeline composed and tested -- [ ] Findings documented clearly -- [ ] Recommendations include specific file paths -- [ ] Peer review completed - ---- - -## Metadata - -**Created:** 2026-05-16 -**Last Updated:** [Date when completed] -**Contributors:** [Your name] -**Related Issues:** [Link to GitHub issue if created] -**Tags:** research, data-analysis, reproducibility, T-sphere, pipeline