This is how we can scale the current Monolithic FastAPI application into a scalable, distributed system.
It includes visual diagrams to help you conceptualize and explain these architectures during an interview.
"Splitting authentication and business logic into separate microservices."
Currently, your backend/app/main.py is a monolith. It handles everything. We want to split it.
graph TD
subgraph "Monolithic Architecture (Current)"
Client1[User] --> Monolith["FastAPI App (Auth + Tasks)"]
Monolith --> DB[(MongoDB)]
end
subgraph "Microservices Architecture (Proposed)"
Client2[User] --> Gateway["API Gateway / Nginx"]
Gateway -->|/auth| AuthService["Auth Service (Port 8001)"]
Gateway -->|/tasks| TaskService["Task Service (Port 8002)"]
AuthService --> DB
TaskService --> DB
end
Explanation:
"Currently, my app is a Monolith where main.py handles both Auth and Tasks. I would split this into two services:
- Auth Service: Handles login/registration (Port 8001).
- Task Service: Handles todo lists (Port 8002). This allows me to scale the Task service independently if it gets heavy traffic."
"Redis can be used for caching frequent reads."
Database queries are slow. Redis (memory) is fast. We check Redis first.
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App as Task Service
participant Redis as Redis Cache
participant DB as MongoDB
User->>App: GET /tasks (Fetch Tasks)
App->>Redis: Check if tasks exist in cache?
alt Cache Hit (Found)
Redis-->>App: Return cached tasks
App-->>User: Return tasks (Fast! ~5ms)
else Cache Miss (Not Found)
Redis-->>App: Null
App->>DB: Query tasks from DB
DB-->>App: Return tasks data
App->>Redis: Save tasks to cache (for next time)
App-->>User: Return tasks (Slower ~100ms)
end
Explanation:
"I would use Redis to cache the list of tasks. When a user creates a task (cache invalidation), I clear the cache so they always see fresh data. This drastically reduces the load on MongoDB."
"Load balancing can distribute traffic across multiple instances."
Run multiple copies of your code and distribute users among them.
graph TD
User[User Traffic] --> Nginx["Load Balancer (Nginx)"]
subgraph "Task Service Instances"
Nginx --> Instance1["Instance 1 (Port 8002)"]
Nginx --> Instance2["Instance 2 (Port 8003)"]
Nginx --> Instance3["Instance 3 (Port 8004)"]
end
Instance1 --> Redis["Redis"]
Instance2 --> Redis
Instance3 --> Redis
Explanation: "To handle more users, I would run 3 instances of my Task Service using Docker. A Load Balancer (like Nginx) sits in front and distributes requests. If Instance 1 is busy, it sends the user to Instance 2."
| Concept | The "What" | The "Why" | In Your Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microservices | Splitting main.py into auth.py and tasks.py servers. |
Independent scaling & fault isolation. | AuthService handles tokens; TaskService verifies them. |
| Redis | Storing GET /tasks results in RAM. |
Speed (ms vs s) & database protection. | Check Redis before await db.tasks.find(). |
| Load Balancing | Nginx distributing requests to 3 Docker containers. | Handling high traffic & redundancy. | Traffic -> Nginx -> [Container A, B, C]. |